Geremia
- 150
- 0
What is the best review article, published in a peer-reviewed journal, introducing string theory?
The discussion revolves around identifying the best review article published in a peer-reviewed journal that introduces string theory. Participants explore various resources, including articles, lecture notes, and textbooks, while considering different levels of understanding and specific aspects of string theory.
Participants do not reach a consensus on a single best review article, as multiple competing views and resources are presented. Preferences for textbooks and articles vary significantly among participants.
Some suggestions are not peer-reviewed, and there is variability in the perceived quality of different resources. The discussion reflects a range of levels of understanding and specific interests within string theory.
An introductory broad overviewxepma said:What level are you looking for?
It's a bit old now, but in the spirit ofGeremia said:What is the best review article, published in a peer-reviewed journal, introducing string theory?
I would vote for it too.humanino said:Otherwise, today I'll vote for
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207142
Demystifier said:I would vote for it too.![]()

There is also a book almost identical to these lectures. (The book contains one additional, but rather irrelevant, chapter).arivero said:It is true it is not a peer-reviewed review, but a set of lecture notes.
My favored books arexepma said:You're probably better off using the standard books like Polchinski, Becker Becker Schwarz, Zwiebach, Green Green Witten.
Demystifier said:My favored books are
Zwiebach for a beginner and
M. Kaku, Introduction to Superstrings and M-theory, for an advanced reader
And I don't like Polchinski's book.![]()
Well, I do. That probably means that you wouldn't like his string book either.George Jones said:I haven't looked at this Kaku book, but I don't like his quantum field theory book.
Yes. In my opinion, the quality of the book significantly varies from chapter to chapter (which probably means that different chapters were written dominantly by different authors).George Jones said:Have you looked at the book by Becker, Becker, and Schwarz?