Bethe formula dependence on charge of the material

pepediaz
Messages
49
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
What is the dependence of the stopping power on the charge of the material on which the charged particle enters?
Relevant Equations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_formula#The_formula
I think that it is a trick question and that the answer is that given dependence does not exist. Could anyone tell me if I am right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pepediaz said:
Homework Statement:: What is the dependence of the stopping power on the charge of the material on which the charged particle enters?
Relevant Equations:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_formula#The_formula

I think that it is a trick question and that the answer is that given dependence does not exist. Could anyone tell me if I am right?
Could it be that the question is badly phrased?

Maybe ‘the charge’ is intended to mean ‘the charged particle’.

So the question should be:
What is the dependence of the stopping power on the charged particle, of the material which the charged particle enters?

Or, re-phrasing it:
What factors affect a material’s stopping power for charged particles of a given type/speed?

That would mean you are being asked to describe how a material’s electron density affects its stopping power. Or you could answer in terms of the material’s density, atomic weight, etc.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top