BICEP & Planck: Estimating Polarized Galactic Dust Emission

MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
To estimate polarized emission from the galactic dust, BICEP digitized an unpublished 353 GHz map shown by the Planck collaboration at a conference. However, it seems they misinterpreted the Planck results: that map shows the polarization fraction for all foregrounds, not for the galactic dust only (see the "not CIB subtracted" caveat in the slide). Once you correct for that and rescale the Planck results appropriately, some experts claim that the polarized galactic dust emission can account for most of the BICEP signal.

http://resonaances.blogspot.com.es/2014/05/is-bicep-wrong.html

http://news.sciencemag.org/physics/2014/05/blockbuster-big-bang-result-may-fizzle-rumor-suggests
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, my understanding is that the jury is still out on whether or not the BICEP signal is really B-mode polarization of the CMB. The good news is, according to a talk I saw recently, there are at least 6 more experiments that should produce results within the next 18 months. So we should know for certain in the next 1-2 years.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top