Bicyclist coasting down hill (Newton's Laws)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bicyclist coasting down a 5° hill at a constant speed, with a focus on the forces acting on the bicyclist, particularly air resistance and gravitational force. The context is rooted in Newton's Laws of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the forces acting on the bicyclist and the implications of mass in the calculations. There is an exploration of how to approach the problem without explicitly using mass in part A.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out that the mass is provided in part B and is necessary for solving part A. There is an ongoing clarification regarding the role of mass in the calculations and whether it is essential for the initial part of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the necessity of mass in part A of the problem, despite it being provided for part B. Participants are questioning the assumptions about mass and its relevance to the initial calculations.

ndifabio
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A bicyclist can coast down a 5° hill at a constant 7.0 km/h. Assume the force of friction (air resistance) is proportional to the speed v so that Fair = cv."

(a) Calculate the value of the constant c.
(b) Calculate the average force that must be applied in order to descend the hill at 22 km/h. The mass of the cyclist plus bicycle is 79 kg.


Homework Equations



Newton's Laws

The Attempt at a Solution



Since a=0, Ʃforce must=0.

Fair=Fg

Fg=mgsin(5°)=Fair

c=mgsin(5°)/v

I just can't figure out how to work around not having mass in this problem.

Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean not having mass? You say the mass of the cyclist + bike is 79kg!
 
your equation is correct...the mass is given in part b. Now try part b.
 
I understand that the mass is given in part B. But not having the mass in the initial problem implies that mass is not needed to solve part A. I was hoping that someone could tell me how to solve part A without mass. Sorry for the confusion
 
The mass applies to both parts. You can't solve part 'a' numerically without knowing the mass, and you can't solve part 'b' numerically without knowing the numerical result of part 'a'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K