Bifilar Pendulum w/ off-centred CM, need verification for derived eq.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of equations related to a bifilar pendulum with an off-centered center of mass. A participant shares diagrams and results, prompting a request for the mathematical work behind those results. Another member offers to provide tips for posting mathematical content using LaTeX. The focus remains on verifying the derived equations and ensuring clarity in the mathematical presentation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of detailed mathematical explanations in physics discussions.
ChessGM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
For an essay I'm looking at the MOI about the central diameter of a composite object (2 flush concentric cylinders, the external cylinder is shorter lengthwise and can slide along the longer one) with a centre of mass that is not on the central diameter. This is done through the external cylinder, and placing it some distance from the centre, and timing its period in a bifilar pendulum.

I have an equation but I'm not sure if its correct, if anyone could take the time to come up with it and cross-reference it that would be appreciated.
Relevant Equations
The "standard" equation is 2 x pi x r x sqrt(IL/mg), but now it does not work because it assumes a centred centre of mass.
Here are some diagrams:
1735683470349.png

1735683493564.png

The mass of the rod is M, and the external cylinder is m. This is what I came up with:
1735683545670.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show your math work that led to that result? I'll send you a message with tips for posting math here at PF using LaTeX.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...