Bijection Proof for Sets and Functions - A Comprehensive Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a function h, defined in terms of a bijection f between sets A and B, is also a bijection. The context is set theory and functions, specifically focusing on the properties of bijections and their implications on power sets.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of showing that f is one-to-one and onto, with some noting that this is already assumed. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the domains and codomains of f and h, and questions arise about how to demonstrate the implications of h being a bijection based on the properties of f.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the proof, particularly regarding the one-to-one aspect of h. There is recognition of the confusion around the definitions and relationships between the sets and functions involved. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly in relation to the definitions of h and its properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with the definitions provided in the problem statement, particularly regarding the domains of f and h, and the implications of assuming f is a bijection. There is also mention of the notation used for power sets, which may require clarification.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Let A and B be sets and let [tex]f: A \rightarrow B[/tex] be a function. Define a function

[tex]h: \mathcal{P} (B) \rightarrow \mathcal{P} (A)[/tex] by declaring that for [tex]Y \in\mathcal{P} (B)[/tex], [tex]h(Y)= \{ x \in A: f(x) \notin Y \}[/tex]. Show that if [tex]f[/tex] is a bijection then h is a bijection.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not quite sure where to start. I could start by first showing that f is one to one & onto and then show that f = h by showing that:
dom(f) = dom(h)
cod(f) = cod(h)
And, [tex]\forall x \in dom(f), f(x)=h(x)[/tex]

Of course, I can't do this because the question doesn't define function f (it only gived domain & codomain)! Does anyone know how to prove this question?

P.S. the notation [tex]\mathcal{P} (A)[/tex] and [tex]\mathcal{P} (B)[/tex] are supposed to represent the power set of A & B.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
I could start by first showing that f is one to one & onto and then show that f = h by showing that:
dom(f) = dom(h)
cod(f) = cod(h)
And, [tex]\forall x \in dom(f), f(x)=h(x)[/tex]
Well, let's start with this. You know several of those subexpressions, don't you? e.g. you know what dom(h) is. What happens when you substitute those values into those equations?
 
roam said:
Show that if [tex]f[/tex] is a bijection then h is a bijection.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not quite sure where to start. I could start by first showing that f is one to one & onto and then show that f = h by showing that:
dom(f) = dom(h)
cod(f) = cod(h)
And, [tex]\forall x \in dom(f), f(x)=h(x)[/tex]

No, this won't work. For one thing, you don't have to show that f is one to one and onto. That would be showing that f is a bijection and your question starts with the assumption that f is a bijection. You don't have to prove it.

Also, [tex]f \neq h[/tex]! You mention showing that their domains are the same, but that's not true. That's actually written in your question statement also. The domain of f is [tex]A[/tex], but the domain of [tex]h[/tex] is [tex]P(B)[/tex]. So f acts on elements of the set [tex]A[/tex], whereas h acts on subsets of the set [tex]B[/tex]. Totally different.

You need to assume that f is a bijection (i.e. one to one and onto) and then show that h must be as well. Just go through the proofs for each of these requirements. For one to one, assume [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2)[/tex], then looking at the definitions of [tex]h(Y)[/tex] in the question (using that f is bijective), you should be able to conclude that [tex]Y_1 = Y_2[/tex]. Then for onto, select an arbitrary subset of [tex]A[/tex], say [tex]A_0[/tex], then try to determine a subset of [tex]B[/tex] that must map to it.
 
Hi mathie girl, your method sounds good. Suppose f is a bijection,

for [tex]Y_1 , Y_2 \in \mathcal{P}(B) = dom(h)[/tex]

Here's the problem: I really can't figure out how to show [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2) \Rightarrow Y_1 = Y_2[/tex] using what is given in the question, I don't know what steps to take. What would you propose? I'm very confused atm :confused:
 
roam said:
Hi mathie girl, your method sounds good. Suppose f is a bijection,

for [tex]Y_1 , Y_2 \in \mathcal{P}(B) = dom(h)[/tex]

Here's the problem: I really can't figure out how to show [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2) \Rightarrow Y_1 = Y_2[/tex] using what is given in the question, I don't know what steps to take. What would you propose? I'm very confused atm :confused:

Okay, you're assuming that [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2)[/tex], right? So [tex]h(Y_1)= \{ x \in A: f(x) \notin Y_1 \}= \{ x \in A: f(x) \notin Y_2 \} = h(Y_2)[/tex]. Then I'd probably do it by contradiction, assuming that [tex]Y_1 \neq Y_2[/tex], so WLOG (without loss of generality) there's some element [tex]b \in Y_1 \setminus Y_2[/tex]. Then using the bijectivity of [tex]f[/tex] and the definition of [tex]h[/tex] to figure out something about [tex]h(Y_1), h(Y_2)[/tex]. Hopefully that's enough to get you started!

Also, the onto part should be much easier. So at least this is the hard part. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K