Finding the range of a function when checking if it is bijective

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the range of a function and checking its bijectivity, specifically focusing on injective and surjective properties. The subject area includes calculus and function analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how the range of the function was determined, with some suggesting that checking the bounds is sufficient given the derivative's behavior. Others inquire about using a general method for finding the range by changing the subject of the formula.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning and clarifying the injective and surjective properties of the function based on its domain. There is a recognition of the need for precision in defining the domain, and some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of the function's increasing nature.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the implications of typos in the domain definition and how they affect the function's properties. The original poster's correction of the domain has led to further exploration of the function's characteristics.

JC2000
Messages
186
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
##f : (-\infty, -1]\Rightarrow(0,e^5]## defined by ##f(x) = e^{x^3-3x+2}##. Check if the function is bijective.
Relevant Equations
Let ##h(x) = x^3 - 3x +2##
To check if it is injective :

##h'(x) = 3(x^2-1)##
##\implies h'(x) \geq 0## for ##x \in (-\infty, -1]##
Thus, ##f(x)## is increasing over the given domain and thus is one-one.

To check if it is surjective :
Range of ##f(x) = (0, e^4]## but co-domain is ##(0, e^5]## thus the function is into and thus cannot be bijective.

My Question :
1.How was the range found?

Edit: Domain of ##f## corrected.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
JC2000 said:
My Question :
1.How was the range found?
##h'(x) \geq 0 ## for the domain, so checking the bounds is sufficient.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JC2000
I see but how would it work if the general method were to be used (changing the subject of the formula to ##x=g(y)## and so on)?

Related question : It makes sense that the exponent is ignored but is there a proof somewhere for this? ( I know that for exponential functions ##a^x## hold for all ##x \in R## if ##a>0##...if that is relevant)
 
JC2000 said:
I see but how would it work if the general method were to be used (changing the subject of the formula to ##x=g(y)## and so on)?

That would require you to solve the cubic <br /> x^3 - 3x + 2 - \ln y = 0 which can be done analytically. You are looking for a real root, which will always exist but may not lie in (-\infty,-1].

Related question : It makes sense that the exponent is ignored but is there a proof somewhere for this? ( I know that for exponential functions ##a^x## hold for all ##x \in R## if ##a>0##...if that is relevant)

exp is strictly increasing. The composition of exp with a strictly increasing function is therefore strictly increasing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JC2000
pasmith said:
exp is strictly increasing. The composition of exp with a strictly increasing function is therefore strictly increasing.

Regarding this, are such facts considered trivial or are they covered extensively under 'real-analysis' or a similar topic?
 
From your problem statement,
##f : (\infty, 1]##
Did you mean ##f : (-\infty, -1]##?
Intervals are always written in left-to-right order.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JC2000
Oh yes! Thanks for pointing that out, I meant ##(-\infty, -1]##
 
Last edited:
That's what I understood.
 
Is the following the accepted solution,given as being correct?

JC2000 said:
To check if it is injective :

##h'(x) = 3(x^2-1)##
##\implies h'(x) \geq 0## for ##x \in (-\infty, -1]##
Thus, ##f(x)## is increasing over the given domain and thus is one-one.

To check if it is surjective :
Range of ##f(x) = (0, e^4]## but co-domain is ##(0, e^5]## thus the function is into and thus cannot be bijective.
If so, then referring back to Mark44's reply:
It's clear that this solution corresponds to function ##f## having a domain of ##(-\infty \,,-1]## .

If, on the other hand, ##f## has a domain of ##(-\infty \,,1]##, then ##f## is neither injective, nor surjective.
corresponding to the OP and your reply to Mark44:
JC2000 said:
Oh yes! Thanks for pointing that out, I meant ##(-\infty, 1]##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JC2000
  • #10
Thank you for going through all the details! The domain is ##(-\infty, -1]##
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
then ##f## is neither injective
Why would it not be injective ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JC2000
  • #12
(-1,1) is not part of the domain -- (an initial typo was corrected)
 
  • #13
Apologies for taking up so much time over typo errors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K