Binary Operation, Abstract Algebra

Click For Summary
A binary operation defined on the integers Z as m * n = m + n + mn raises questions about its properties. The operation is not associative, as demonstrated by specific examples showing that (m * n) * p does not equal m * (n * p). Additionally, there is no identity element e in Z that satisfies z * e = z for all integers z, as the equation z + e + ez cannot simplify to z for any integer e. The discussion emphasizes understanding the definitions of associativity and identity elements in abstract algebra. Overall, the operation's structure reveals important insights into binary operations in mathematics.
ksheehan62
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Define a binary operation on Z, the set of integers by the equation m * n = m + n + mn. Which of the following statemnts is / are true about the binary structure of Z with *

1) * is not associative
2) There is no element e belonging to Z such that for every z belonging to Z, z*e = e*z = z
3) Property 2) holds but there exists z belonging to Z such that for every y belonging to Z zy does not equal e

A) 1 and 2 only
B) 1 and 3 only
C) 2 only
D) 3 only
E) none of them

Can someone help I have no taken any abstract algebra yet so I am not sure exactly what to do can figure this out please

Well I know associativity means the grouping of addents doesn't matter
i.e (a + b) + c = a ( b + c )

So m *n should be associative then right?
Because m * n = m + n + mn is just adding 3 terms so why shouldn't it be associative.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ksheehan62 said:
Define a binary operation on Z, the set of integers by the equation m * n = m + n + mn. Which of the following statemnts is / are true about the binary structure of Z with *

1) * is not associative
2) There is no element e belonging to Z such that for every z belonging to Z, z*e = e*z = z
3) Property 2) holds but there exists z belonging to Z such that for every y belonging to Z zy does not equal e

A) 1 and 2 only
B) 1 and 3 only
C) 2 only
D) 3 only
E) none of them

Can someone help I have no taken any abstract algebra yet so I am not sure exactly what to do can figure this out please

You don't need to already have had training in abstract algebra. Let's first see what we (you) already know. Do you have a solid understanding of what "associative" means? Once you have that, we can talk more about whether the ``*'' operator you have described has this property.

As for 2), according to the rule, z*e would be equal to z+e+ez. Can z*e be equal to z? That is, can you think of an integer e such that no matter what other integer z we pick (i.e. regardless of what z value we use), z+e+ez = z?

Part 3) only applies if you can do 2); so give 2) some thought and we can move forward once you can answer 2).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
842
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K