Elements of an Equivalence Class

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an equivalence relation defined on the set of integers, specifically examining the properties of equivalence classes under multiplication. The original poster seeks to prove that the product of two elements from distinct equivalence classes also belongs to the equivalence class of the product of their representatives.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the equivalence classes and the product of their elements, questioning how to systematically prove the stated property. There are attempts to manipulate the definitions and properties of equivalence classes, including specific examples to illustrate the concept.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the necessary calculations and logical steps. There is recognition of the need to clarify certain expressions and relationships, and some participants express confusion regarding the implications of their calculations. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted correction regarding the expressions used in the attempts, indicating that participants are refining their understanding of the problem. The original poster acknowledges a mistake in their initial reasoning, which has led to further clarification and exploration of the proof.

Numberphile
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >

Question:
Let ~ be the equivalence relation on the set ℤ of integers defined by a~b if a-b is divisible by 5. Let k ∈ Em belong to the equivalence class of m, and l ∈ En belong to the equivalence class of n. Prove that the product kl belongs to the equivalence class Emn.

What I've tried:
Since k ∈ Em, then m - k = 5x, for x ∈ ℤ.
Also, since l ∈ En, then n - l = 5y, for y ∈ ℤ.
So, I need to show that m*n - k*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ.
I've tried multiplying (m-k)*(n-l), but to no avail.
So I tried one case. Let m=20, k=10, n=30, and l=5.
Well, 20-10=5(2), so 10 ∈ E20, and 30-5=5(5), so 5 ∈ E30
Also, 600-50=5(110), so 50 ∈ E600, which for this case means kl ∈ Emn.

Dilemma:
I'm convinced the product kl belongs to the equivalence class of m*n always, so I'm having trouble actually finding a systematic way of proving it in general, instead of using a specific case.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Numberphile said:
Question:
Let ~ be the equivalence relation on the set ℤ of integers defined by a~b if a-b is divisible by 5. Let k ∈ Em belong to the equivalence class of m, and l ∈ En belong to the equivalence class of n. Prove that the product kl belongs to the equivalence class Emn.

What I've tried:
Since k ∈ Em, then m - k = 5x, for x ∈ ℤ.
Also, since l ∈ En, then n - l = 5y, for y ∈ ℤ.
So, I need to show that m*k - n*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ.
I've tried multiplying (m-k)*(n-l), but to no avail.
So I tried one case. Let m=20, k=10, n=30, and l=5.
Well, 20-10=5(2), so 10 ∈ E20, and 30-5=5(5), so 5 ∈ E30
Also, 600-50=5(110), so 50 ∈ E600, which for this case means kl ∈ Emn.

Dilemma:
I'm convinced the product kl belongs to the equivalence class of m*n always, so I'm having trouble actually finding a systematic way of proving it in general, instead of using a specific case.
Why haven't you calculated what you are actually looking for: ##m\cdot n - k \cdot l##?
 
I haven't calculated that because I'm not sure what that would represent.
I know an equivalence class is defined as a relation on a set S with x ∈ S, then the equivalence class of x is
Ex = {y ∈ S | x ~ y}
 
Numberphile said:
I haven't calculated that because I'm not sure what that would represent.
Here's the answer:
Numberphile said:
So, I need to show that m*k - n*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ
And here's the way:
Numberphile said:
Since k ∈ Em, then m - k = 5x, for x ∈ ℤ.
Also, since l ∈ En, then n - l = 5y, for y ∈ ℤ.
##mk-kl = (5x+k)(5y+l)-kl= \dots ##
 
I may have made a mistake in my "What I've tried" section.
I already corrected it in my original post.

It should have read
show that m*n - k*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ.

My apologies.
 
Numberphile said:
I may have made a mistake in my "What I've tried" section.
I already corrected it in my original post.

It should have readMy apologies.
No, my sorry, I had a typo. Of course it's ##mn-kl=(5x-k)(5y-l)-kl= \dots##
The point is: you already have everything you need in your post. What is ##mn-kl##?
 
I'm not sure that I follow the logic.
mn - kl = (5x+k)(5y+l) - kl

I expanded this, and trivially, I obtain that mn - kl = mn - kl
 
Numberphile said:
I'm not sure that I follow the logic.
mn - kl = (5x+k)(5y+l) - kl

I expanded this, and trivially, I obtain that mn - kl = mn - kl
You set ##m=5x-k## and ##n=5y-l## which you can do because ##k\in E_m## and ##l\in E_n##.
This is correct. Also correct is, that ##mn-kl=5z## for some ##z \in \mathbb{Z}## has to be shown, because it would mean ##E_{mn}=E_{kl}## what we need. Now, simply substitute ##m## and ##n## to get
##mn-kl=(5x-k)(5y-l)-kl=25xy-5xl-5yk+kl-kl=25xy-5xl-5yk=5z##.
This line was all what's been missing.
 
Ah, I see it now! (Though I think the signs are a bit off, but nonetheless it should be the same)

Since 25xy + 5xl + 5yk = 5(5xy) + 5(xl) + 5(yk) = 5[5xy + xl +yk], then this is just an 5z, as [5xy + xl + yk] is just some integer.

Perfect! Thank you so much.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K