Binomial expansion comparison with legendre polynomial expansion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
linda300
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I've been working on this question which asks to show that

[itex]{{P}_{n}}(x)=\frac{1}{{{2}^{n}}n!}\frac{{{d}^{n}}}{d{{x}^{n}}}{{\left( {{x}^{2}}-1 \right)}^{n}}[/itex]

So first taking the n derivatives of the binomial expansions of (x2-1)n

[itex]{{({{x}^{2}}-1)}^{n}}=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}{{{(-1)}^{k}}\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}{{x}^{2n-2k}}}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{{{d}^{n}}}{d{{x}^{n}}}...=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}{{{(-1)}^{k}}\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}(2n-2k)(2n-2k-1)...(2n-2k-n+1){{x}^{2n-2k}}}[/itex]
[itex]=n!\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}{{{(-1)}^{k}}\frac{(2n-2k)!}{k!(n-k)!(n-2k)!}{{x}^{2n-2k}}}[/itex]and comparing it with[itex]{{P}_{n}}(x)=\sum\limits_{m=0}^{M}{{{(-1)}^{m}}\frac{(2n-2m)!}{{{2}^{n}}m!(n-m)!(n-2m)!}{{x}^{n-2m}}},\,\,\,\,M=\frac{n}{2},\frac{n-1}{2}[/itex]

[itex]=\frac{1}{{{2}^{n}}}\sum\limits_{m=0}^{\frac{n}{2}}{{{(-1)}^{m}}\frac{(2n-2m)!}{m!(n-m)!(n-2m)!}{{x}^{n-2m}}}[/itex]

I'm having trouble with the final part,

It's clear that there's a factor of 1/n!2n difference between them but also

the Pn(x) series has m=0...n/2, and also xn , where as the n'th derivative series has k=0...n and x2n.

How can you rewrite one in terms of the other so they both have the same sum limits?

I've tried setting k=2s in the n'th derivative series and a bunch of other similar changes, but non will change the n'th powers of x.

The reason I noticed this was because the last terms of the series arn't the same,

the first series has last term, (-n)! on the bottom, means 1/infinity right?

[itex]n!{{(-1)}^{n}}\frac{0!}{n!0!(-n)!}[/itex]

and the second

[itex]\frac{1}{{{2}^{n}}}{{(-1)}^{\frac{n}{2}}}\frac{n!}{n!(\frac{n}{2})!0!}{{x}^{0}}[/itex]

Have I made a mistake early on or is there a clever way to combine the two series?

Thanks,

Linda
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi linda300! :smile:

The factor 1/n!2n is already present in your first equation, so that is not a difference.

When you took the n-th derivative, you didn't lower the power of x by n, so you should have xn-2k instead of x2n-2k

Finally, when you take the derivative of x0 you should get zero, and not a negative power of x.
So you should leave out the first n/2 terms, since they are all zero.
 
Thanks heaps for taking the time to find my silly mistakes!

=D