Binomial Theorem and Modular Arithmetic Proof Check

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof related to the Binomial Theorem and modular arithmetic, specifically examining the statement that for a prime integer p, the expression (x+p)^p is congruent to x^p + y^p for all integers x and y, under modulo p conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants analyze the proof structure, questioning the validity of specific steps and the use of binomial coefficients. There is a focus on the divisibility of terms by p and the correct interpretation of modular arithmetic in the context of the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the proof's clarity and correctness. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of binomial coefficients and the implications of modular arithmetic, but no consensus has been reached on the proof's validity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential errors in the proof, particularly concerning the summation of terms and the application of previously proven theorems related to binomial coefficients. There is an emphasis on ensuring that all terms align with the conditions set by the problem statement.

Hotsuma
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\mbox{Prove or give a counterexample: If p is a prime integer, then for all integers x and y, } (x+p)^p \equiv_p x^p+y^p[/tex].

Homework Equations



[tex]\equiv_p \mbox{just means (mod p).<br /> <br /> Can you please check and see if this proof is well-formed?}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\mbox{Pf: Assume p is prime. Then} (x+y)^p=<br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> 0\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> x^p+<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> 1\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> x^{p-1}y+<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> 2\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> x^{p-2}y^2+ ... + <br /> \left(\begin{array}{c c}<br /> p\\<br /> p-1\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> xy^{p-1}+<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> p\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> y^p = x^p + \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}x^ky^{p-k}+y^p.[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Notice that} \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}x^ky^{p-k} = \frac{p!}{k!(p-k)!}\mbox{, which, by a previously proven theorem, we know that } p\left| \frac{p!}{k!(p-k)!} \right..[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{ So, by the definition of (mod p) we know that} \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}x^ky^{p-k}+y^p \equiv_p 0 \mbox{ and therefore }(x+p)^p \equiv_p x^p+y^p ~~~~\hspace{1.0cm}_\blacksquare[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not well formed. [tex]\sum^{p-1}_{k=1}x^ky^{p-k} = \frac{p!}{k!(p-k)!}[/tex] is completely false. You are summing over k. There can't be a k in the answer. The point is that each individual binomial coefficient C(p,k) is divisible by p for 1<=k<=p-1.
 
I discovered my error. Give me a minute.
 
[tex] \mbox{Pf: Assume p is prime. Then} (x+y)^p=<br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> 0\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> x^p+<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> 1\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> x^{p-1}y+<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> 2\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> x^{p-2}y^2+ ... + <br /> \left(\begin{array}{c c}<br /> p\\<br /> p-1\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> xy^{p-1}+<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> p\\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> y^p[/tex]
[tex]= x^p + \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}\left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{array}\right)x^ky^{p-k}+y^p. [/tex]

[tex] \mbox{Notice that} \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}\left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{array}\right)x^ky^{p-k} = \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}\left[\left(\frac{p!}{k!(p-k)!}\right) x^ky^{p-k}\right]\mbox{, which, by a previously proven theorem, we know that } p\left| \frac{p!}{k!(p-k)!} \right..[/tex]

[tex] \mbox{ So, by the definition of (mod p) we know that} \sum^{p-1}_{k=1}\left(\begin{array}{l c}<br /> p\\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{array}\right)x^ky^{p-k}+y^p \equiv_p 0 \mbox{ and therefore }(x+y)^p \equiv_p x^p+y^p ~~~~\hspace{1.0cm}_\blacksquare[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Alright. How does that look?
 
The third line is still completely garbled. The second line would say you can ignore the k=1 to k=p-1 terms because they are all divisible by p. Say the the previous theorem you are citing is for 1<=k<=p-1. On the last line (x+p)^p? Come on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K