Bismuth sulphide structural diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The structural diagram of Bismuth(III) Sulphide (Bi2S3) requires careful consideration of electron distribution and atomic charges. The discussion highlights that the proposed structure with S-S-S and Bi=Bi leads to an unstable configuration with too many charged species. A more favorable structure involves only two charged species: one S- and one Bi+, which is energetically preferable and maintains charge balance. Understanding the number of non-bonding electrons is crucial for accurate structural representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular structure and bonding
  • Knowledge of atomic charges and electron distribution
  • Familiarity with Bismuth(III) Sulphide chemistry
  • Basic principles of molecular stability and energetics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the molecular geometry of Bismuth(III) Sulphide (Bi2S3)
  • Study the principles of electron counting in molecular structures
  • Learn about the stability of charged species in chemical compounds
  • Explore computational chemistry tools for modeling molecular structures
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, materials scientists, and researchers interested in semiconductor materials and their structural properties.

PhysicBeginner
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me if the structural diagarm of Bismuth(III) Sulphide looks like this:

S-S-S
l l
Bi = Bi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They want to have a total of 40 electrons.
They have a total of 28.
That leaves a difference of 12 e-, divide by 2e- per bond, meaning there are going to be 6 bonds.
The structural diagram would look like this (i think).
 

Attachments

  • Bi2S3.gif
    Bi2S3.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 612
That's a good attempt, rocketboy...but I don't think it's the right structure. For one thing, it creates too many charged species (with the central S-atom having to accommodate a 2+ charge)

I can think of a structure that requires only two singly-charged species.

PhysicsBeginner : It's an important part of the process that you figure out the charges on the different atoms. To do this, you must also determine the number of non-bonding electrons on each atom.

The failure of your structure lies in the following :

1. It requires 4 charged atoms (and it requires an S to hold a positive charge and a Bi to hold a negative charge; both of which are against their tendencies)

2. It proposes a long, linear molecule, which is energetically less favorable than a more compact structure, like the one suggested by rocketboy.

3. There's a structure that is more compact still, and yet has only 2 charged species (an S- and a Bi+).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
658