Block Hitting Spring: Time to Travel x=0 to x1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass m=1 kg moving horizontally and colliding with a massless spring with a spring constant k=3 N/m. The block experiences friction with a coefficient that varies with distance, described by μ(x)=αx, where α=0.7 m^−1. The objective is to determine the time t1 it takes for the block to travel from the relaxed spring position (x=0) to the point where it first comes to a stop (x=x1).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the applicability of simple harmonic motion (SHO) given the presence of friction and question the validity of using SHO equations.
  • Some participants suggest using the work-energy theorem to find the distance traveled and explore equations of motion to determine time.
  • There are inquiries about the relationship between angular frequency and the period of motion, particularly regarding the fraction of the period corresponding to the block's motion from maximum kinetic energy to maximum potential energy.
  • Questions arise about the choice of angles in the general solution for the SHO equations and how they affect the time calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various approaches to the problem. Some have provided insights into the relationship between energy and motion, while others are clarifying the implications of friction on the system's behavior. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive questions and guidance have been shared regarding the nature of the motion and the use of SHO concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the non-uniform friction and the need to reconcile different methods of analysis, including energy considerations and differential equations. There is uncertainty about the correct application of equations of motion in the context of variable acceleration due to friction.

Tanero
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small block of mass m=1 kg and v0=6.32m/s hits a massless relaxed spring with spring constant k= 3 N/m, which starts to be compressed as the block continues to move horizontally. There is friction between the block and the horizontal surface, and it is not uniform. As a function of distance, the friction coefficient varies like μ(x)=αx, with α= 0.7 m^−1. For simplicity that static and dynamic friction coefficients are the same.

What time t1 does it take for the block to travel between x=0 (relaxed spring) and x=x1 (block at first stop)? (in seconds)

https://courses.edx.org/static/content-mit-801x~2013_SOND/html/final_p06.png

Homework Equations


I chose x-axis positive to the right. x0=0 at point of contact, x1=first momentarily stop
Ffriction=-μmg=-αxmg
Fspring=-kx

Newton's Second Law
∑F=m*d2x/dt2

The Attempt at a Solution



-kx-αxmg=m*d2x/dt2
-(k+αmg)x=m*d2x/dt2

new konstant K=k+αmg
-K/m=d2x/dt2

This is SHO with general solution x(t)=Acos(ωt+θ)
ω=√(K/m)=3.16

To find A, and θ our initial conditions are:
x0=x(t=0)=0
v0=v(t=0)=6.32 m/s

Thus, 0=x(t=0)=Acos(θ)
This is true when θ=pi/2 or -3/2pi . Question: which angle should I use ?

v0=v(t=0)=6.32/-ω=Asin(θ)

A=√(x(t=o)^2+(v(t=0)/ω)^2)=√(0+(6.32/3.16)^2/)=2

So, I know that my amplitude is 2, x1=2m.

(Trying with 3/2pi. pi/2 can't feet because I am getting negative time.)

2=x(t1)=2*cos(3.16t-3/2pi)

1=cos(3.16t-3/2pi)
This is true when (3.16t-3/2pi)=0
t1=1.49 sec.

Please, check my solution if it seemed to be right.
And my t1 should be also half a period T=pi/ω=pi/3.16=0.99s. Isn't it? I am confused.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not SHO because there is friction between the block and the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
So, what approach should I take instead?
 
Do you have any ideas?
 
I have found how far it travels using work - energy theorem. May be using equations of motion: x(t)=x0+v0t+1/2at^2, v(t)=v0+at. and for acceleration put acceleration from N2L -(k+αmg)/m*x=d2x/dt2. May be then I can find my t?
 
I have re-read the problem and your original solution, and I must say that I misunderstood what you were doing.

While the system is not an SHO, it is not incorrect to treat it as an SHO until the block stops because the equation is the same.

You have found the angular frequency ##\omega## of this system. How does that correspond to the period? What part of the period is spent by an SHO between max kinetic energy and max potential energy?
 
voko said:
You have found the angular frequency ##\omega## of this system. How does that correspond to the period? What part of the period is spent by an SHO between max kinetic energy and max potential energy?

T=2pi/ω. Between those two conditions block on spring spends half period T/2=pi/ω ?
 
Correct. So what is your answer?
 
T=pi/ω=pi/3.16=0.99 s.

But I tried using equations of motion: v(t)=v0+at. for acceleration I put acceleration from N2L -(k+αmg)/m*x=d2x/dt2.

0=v(t1)=vo-(k+αmg)/m*x*t
x1=2
t1=.316 s.

Something wrong.
 
  • #10
Your equation of motion is $$ - {k + \alpha m g \over m} x = {d^2 x \over dt^2} .$$ This is a differential equation and its solution cannot be obtained by multiplying it by ##t##. In fact, its solution is given by ## x = A \cos (\omega t + \theta) ## as you wrote originally.
 
  • #11
But this equation v(t)=v0+at is also differential v(t)=v0+d2x/dt2*t . I have acceleration in both equations. I substitute one into another. Wanna understand why this is not right thing to do?
 
  • #12
## v(t) = v_0 + at ## is only correct when ## a = \mathrm{const} ##. Which is not the case here. In this case, we have ## v(t) = -A \omega \sin (\omega t + \theta) ##, and ## a = -A \omega^2 \cos (\omega t + \theta) \ne \mathrm{const} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
ahhh! sure, a is constant! that's why you can't. Thanks!
 
  • #14
Tanero said:
T=2pi/ω. Between those two conditions block on spring spends half period T/2=pi/ω ?



Could either of you please explain why half of the period should be used?
 
  • #15
I found the max displacement for the mass via the energy work theorem, basically
-> Potential Energy became Kinetic Energy at the end of the track
-> in the collision no energy is lost as it is stated by the problem, so
-> it is KE = Work F_spring + Work F_friction
-> they both change with x so i took the integral from x0 to x1 for both the Work done
that way I found max displacement.

1) is that correct?
2) is it possible to find the time without SHO equations?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
@ dummyano
1) Yes, the way you found x is correct.
2) It seems you can't find t without SHO

I am very much in doubt about finding t from T/2 . It doesn't agree with t found from solving SHO general solution equation. See above. I am stuck.
 
  • #17
Geldof said:
Could either of you please explain why half of the period should be used?

because it when object slides to the right it makes half a period.
 
  • #18
voko said:
You have found the angular frequency ##\omega## of this system. How does that correspond to the period? What part of the period is spent by an SHO between max kinetic energy and max potential energy?

I am very much in doubt about finding t from T/2 . It doesn't agree with t found from solving SHO general solution equation. See above.

Can you please comment?
 
  • #19
Tanero said:
@ dummyano
1) Yes, the way you found x is correct.
2) It seems you can't find t without SHO

I am very much in doubt about finding t from T/2 . It doesn't agree with t found from solving SHO general solution equation. See above. I am stuck.

Thank you for answering.
I will try SHO for t and post the result then
 
  • #20
What fraction of a period does it take for a mass in SHM to travel from the equilibrium position to the first time it comes to rest?
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Tanero said:
To find A, and θ our initial conditions are:
x0=x(t=0)=0
v0=v(t=0)=6.32 m/s

Thus, 0=x(t=0)=Acos(θ)
This is true when θ=pi/2 or -3/2pi .

pi/2 and -3pi/2 are effectively the same angle. (They differ by a full cycle.)

Try to find another choice for θ.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #22
Tanero said:
I am very much in doubt about finding t from T/2 . It doesn't agree with t found from solving SHO general solution equation. See above.

Can you please comment?

Your doubts are right on. A simple harmonic oscillator goes like this:

(0) max kinetic energy, velocity directed to the right;

(1) max potential energy, no velocity;

(2) max kinetic energy, velocity directed to the left;

(3) max potential energy, no velocity;

(4) max kinetic energy, velocity directed to the right; this completes the period.

In this case, you are interested in the transition from (0) to (1). How much of the period is that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #23
voko said:
Your doubts are right on. A simple harmonic oscillator goes like this:

(0) max kinetic energy, velocity directed to the right;

(1) max potential energy, no velocity;

(2) max kinetic energy, velocity directed to the left;

(3) max potential energy, no velocity;

(4) max kinetic energy, velocity directed to the right; this completes the period.

In this case, you are interested in the transition from (0) to (1). How much of the period is that?

wow! voko! you are opening my eyes on SHO! I never thought of period like this. So, it's T/4? right?
 
  • #24
TSny said:
pi/2 and -3pi/2 are effectively the same angle. (They differ by a full cycle.)

Try to find another choice for θ.

Well, I was trying to find other choices, but only these two angles make x(t=0)=0 .
Moreover, problem is that when I put pi/2 to find my time I get negative time. That's why i chose 3/2pi to overcome it.

Can you suggest the angle? I don't see. May be I can find angle from v0=v(t=0) part of solution. I know A, v0, w, then try to find angle through arcsin...
 
  • #25
Tanero said:
So, it's T/4? right?

Yes, T/4 should be right. Sorry for not spotting the mistake earlier.
 
  • #26
Tanero said:
Can you suggest the angle? I don't see. May be I can find angle from v0=v(t=0) part of solution. I know A, v0, w, then try to find angle through arcsin...

Try thinking logically. You know that the block is at ##x = 0## at ## t_0 = 0 ##. Thus you know that ## \cos (\phi_0) = 0 ##, where ## \phi_0 = \omega t_0 + \theta = \theta ## is the initial phase of the oscillation. The block then goes to the farthest point at ## x = A ##; this clearly must correspond to ## \cos (\phi_1) = 1 ##, where ## \phi_1 = \omega t_1 + \theta ## is the final phase of the oscillation. Look at the unit circle: where does the cosine function goes from zero to 1 as the angle increases? What is the angle difference? This difference then must be equal to the phase difference ## \phi_1 - \phi_0 = \omega t_1 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #27
dummyano said:
Thank you for answering.
I will try SHO for t and post the result then

This is my result for SHO, thank both you and voko for the hint on period!

Data
V_0= sqrt(40)
K = 8
%mu = 0.8 x

Results
Max displacement = sqrt(5/2)

for SHO I did
m(d^2x/dt^2) = -kx - Ff
(d^2x/dt^2) = -16x
w = 4
T = pi / 8
 
  • #28
Tanero said:
Can you suggest the angle? I don't see. May be I can find angle from v0=v(t=0) part of solution. I know A, v0, w, then try to find angle through arcsin...

Voko has given a good suggestion. You could also graph the cosine function. You know that the cosine equals 0 when its argument is -3pi/2 or pi/2. Is there an value between those which will also make the cosine 0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K