Block hung from vertical spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block suspended from a vertical spring, which stretches by a specified distance. The parameters include the mass of the block and the spring constant, with a focus on determining the change in potential energy of the system, which includes the earth, spring, and block.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy, questioning whether both elastic and gravitational potential energy should be considered. There is uncertainty about the initial conditions and the interpretation of the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the need to account for multiple forms of potential energy. There is ongoing clarification regarding the problem's requirements and the correct approach to calculating total potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a diagram in the original post and the implications of treating the earth, spring, and block as a system. There is mention of potential confusion regarding the terms used in the problem statement.

Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


A block is hung from a vertical spring. The spring stretches (h = .0650 m ) for a particular instant in time. Consider the earth, spring, and block to be in the system. If m = .865 kg and k = 125 N/m, find the change in the systems potential energy between the two times depicted.

Homework Equations


(1/2)ky^2(final) - (1/2)ky^2(initial)

The Attempt at a Solution


My book actually doesn't have an answer for this question. I assume the equation I wrote above is the one I use.

Plugging in I got:

(1/2)(125)(-.0650)^2 - (1/2)(125)(0) = .2640625

does the answer I got seem correct to everybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question statement is unclear. Is the block attached to the spring with the spring relaxed, and then released? The text implies a diagram, but you did not post one.
It asks for the change in "potential energy", but you only calculated a change in elastic potential energy.
 
Is there any gravitational potential energy involved? The question seems to imply that there should be.
 
haruspex said:
The question statement is unclear. Is the block attached to the spring with the spring relaxed, and then released? The text implies a diagram, but you did not post one.
It asks for the change in "potential energy", but you only calculated a change in elastic potential energy.
Sorry. Yes there is a diagram. It starts with a block at (0,0) and then the block goes to (0, -.0650 m)
 
Rijad Hadzic said:
Sorry. Yes there is a diagram. It starts with a block at (0,0) and then the block goes to (0, -.0650 m)
So what is the total change in PE?
 
haruspex said:
So what is the total change in PE?
Is it .2640625 Joules?
 
Rijad Hadzic said:
Is it .2640625 Joules?
No, that's just the change in elastic potential energy. Reread posts #2 and #3.
 
haruspex said:
No, that's just the change in elastic potential energy. Reread posts #2 and #3.

http://imgur.com/7OmNvFY

Here is the full question. It is question number 26. The section its under is called "Elastic Potential Energy."

Sorry I didn't make these clear in the OP
 
Rijad Hadzic said:
http://imgur.com/7OmNvFY

Here is the full question. It is question number 26. The section its under is called "Elastic Potential Energy."

Sorry I didn't make these clear in the OP
No, you had it right in the OP. It says to treat the Earth, spring and block as The System, and asks for the change in potential energy of The System. It does not restrict it to elastic potential energy. If it did, there would be no need to consider the Earth as part of The System.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
No, you had it right in the OP. It says to treat the Earth, spring and block as The System, and asks for the change in potential energy of The System. It does not restrict it to elastic potential energy. If it did, there would be no need to consider the Earth as part of The System.

I see. So what I do now is add my answer in the op, with (Gravitational potential energy final - Gravitational potential energy final) to get total PE for the system?
 
  • #11
Rijad Hadzic said:
I see. So what I do now is add my answer in the op, with (Gravitational potential energy final - Gravitational potential energy final) to get total PE for the system?
Yes (except you didn't mean "final" twice).
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Yes (except you didn't mean "final" twice).

Wow I was sure I wrote (Gravitational potential energy final - Gravitational potential energy initial,) lol.

So the key with this problem is understanding there is 2 sources of energy and to add these up to get the net potential energy, right?
 
  • #13
Rijad Hadzic said:
Wow I was sure I wrote (Gravitational potential energy final - Gravitational potential energy initial,) lol.

So the key with this problem is understanding there is 2 sources of energy and to add these up to get the net potential energy, right?
It's that there are two forms of potential energy involved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K