Block sliding up an inclined plane lab

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block sliding up a 22° inclined plane with an initial speed of 3 m/s. Participants are exploring how to calculate the distance the block travels up the incline and the time it takes to return to its starting point, while considering the effects of gravity and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to resolve the acceleration due to gravity along the incline and question the correct application of trigonometric functions in this context. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the components of gravity and the inclined plane.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the problem by suggesting a change in the coordinate system to align with the incline. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem setup and the implications of resolving forces in various ways.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the absence of friction in the problem, which influences the discussion on how to resolve forces and calculate acceleration. Participants are also reflecting on their understanding of the physics involved, indicating a learning process in progress.

TrpnBils
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block is given an initial speed of 3m/s up a 22° inclined plane. How far up the plane will it go? How much time elapses before it returns to its starting point?


Homework Equations


D = 1/2at2
a = Δv/t
Vf2 = Vi2+ 2a*d

The Attempt at a Solution


The Vy is 1.12m/s. If you assume 9.8m/s2 for gravity, then shouldn't you be able to run it through the second equation above to get a time of 0.22 seconds until it stops (half the amount of time til it returns to its original spot)?

As for distance, if you use the third equation there and gravity as your acceleration, shouldn't you be able to solve it that way?

The answers are apparently 1.2m up the plane and 1.6 seconds round-trip but I don't know how...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello TrpnBils,
Again the acceleration due to gravity has to be resolved parallel to the incline .Then your equations work with the right value of a .
regards
Yukoel
 
Like I asked in my other question here tonight, WHY am I multiplying the sine of the angle by the hypotenuse value rather than dividing by it?

In my mind, 9.8 is the Y value because it points downward on the right triangle that the inclined plane forms. It is opposite the 22 degree angle, and the length of the ramp is the hypotenuse of the right triangle. Sin(theta) = opposite/hypotenuse, right? If that's the case, then to find the hypotenuse "part" of the acceleration, why am I multiplying by sin(theta) rather than dividing by it?
 
If you mean Vy to be vertical (i.e. opposite the direction of gravity) then that's the hard way to do it. Remember, the block is slowing down in the horizontal direction as well.

Try orienting your axis so the x-axis is pointing up the slope, and resolving gravity (i.e. not velocity) into components. Since you don't have friction (?) you can just find the proportion of g that acts against the motion.
 
Last edited:
g is the hypotenuse.
there is a component pointing down the slope, call is a, and a component perpendicular to the slope, call it b. These three form a right-angled triangle - the angle between g and b is 22 degrees. You need to find a, which is the opposite side.
 
How/why is g the hypotenuse if gravity's acceleration is pointing straight down, and not down the length of the ramp?
 
Because your axis are aligned with the slope not with gravity.
Look - just humour us and try it that way and see. The way you are trying is needlessly complicated.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Because your axis are aligned with the slope not with gravity.
Look - just humour us and try it that way and see. The way you are trying is needlessly complicated.

haha, yeah I can see that it's needlessly complicated...I'd like to humor you and get the right answer using your method, but I can't logically see why it would work that way. In other words, if I came across another problem like this, I'm sure I could do it using what you've told me, but I still don't know WHY it's working that way.
 
Let me give this another go-round here with your method and see if I can get it...
 
  • #10
So if I rotate it so that the actual inclined surface of the ramp is now my X-axis, I get this...correct?
 

Attachments

  • ramp2.jpg
    ramp2.jpg
    6.5 KB · Views: 611
  • #11
Acceleration in the vertical direction here would then be 3.67m/s^2, correct?
 
  • #12
Nevermind...got it. I just needed to walk away for a few minutes and stop thinking about it. Thanks everyone!
 
  • #13
Not quite - compare:
inclined-plane-acceleration.gif

... this one resolves forces.
The normal force N is the y axis. W is the direction of gravity.
The components of a force (or, in your case, the resulting acceleration) are always smaller than the actual force.
You have to be careful to identify the angle correctly.

(this one includes friction as fk which, in your case, is zero.)

You can put your axis any way you like and apply the physics, and get the same answer ... it's just that some orientations make the math easier.
If you align your axis with gravity, which feels intuitively "natural" to do, you have to account for the way the ramp pushes on the block ... this would mean resolving the N force horizontally and vertically. The ramp slows the vertical fall due to gravity and pushes horizontally as well. Messy to think about ... easier to think of the ramp as changing the net force to one that just points down the ramp... then do it in 1D.

[edit]Our posts crossed - well done.
Sometimes a change of scene helps.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Ok thanks - I think my problem was that I was trying to adjust ALL the variables (acceleration, velocity, etc). Just rotating, adjusting ONE variable, and then using the others as-is seems easier for sure.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K