Bode Plot Method For a Transfer Function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the interpretation of a Bode plot method for a transfer function. Participants clarify that the transfer function's numerator and denominator were incorrectly standardized, losing a factor of 10 in the numerator. They emphasize the importance of using the correct form for frequency-dependent expressions, specifically noting that the j in the expression should not be squared. The correct amplitude expression involves using 20 log, which can be simplified mathematically. Overall, the conversation highlights common pitfalls in Bode plot analysis and the need for careful attention to detail in calculations.
jendrix
Messages
120
Reaction score
4
Hi ,

I was hoping you could look at this link and let me know if I have interpreted the method correctly

http://i.imgur.com/5axTiBN.jpg

As I understand it the transfer function has had s replaced by jw but also the top and bottom are divided by 10 -
This is so that the brackets on the bottom fit a first order lag? Though it looks like they forgot to divide the top by 10.

When it gets put into dB form 20log10 is used for the first term though?

Is that correct and the 100 in the numerator is a typo?Thanks
 
Yes, they factorized the denominator from (jω + 10) to 10(jω/10 + 1) but accidently lost that first 10.

The reason for standardising on the form (jω/N + 1) is so that for ω<<N this term contributes a value of approx unity to the T.F. so can be "ignored" until ω→N.

I don't like their use of 10‧log |(jω)2 + 1|
I think the j should not be included like that; we don't want to square the j.

The full expression for the amplitude of each term does correctly involve 20‧log
but because each frequency-dependent expression is of the form,
e.g., 20‧log √((1/10)2 + 12)
the rules of mathematics allow them to combine the 20 and the √ and write it as 10 without the √.

you should satisfy yourself of the validity of this.

A little confusing! [emoji84]
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
35K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K