Body thrown at an angle to the horizontal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the equation for time, t = (Vb - Va)/g, in the context of projectile motion. Participants debate the adequacy of the problem statement, which lacks specific details about the velocities at points A and B. There is confusion regarding whether to treat vertical components as vectors and how to handle signs in calculations. The consensus is that the problem may be intentionally misleading, as it does not clearly define which variables can be assumed. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of clarity in physics problems to avoid misinterpretation.
rbh
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
In the picture below you can see part of trajectory of a body thrown with an angle to the horizont. At point A the speed was 20m/s. How much time did it take for the body to move from point A to B?
Relevant Equations
V = Vo + at
The answer says t = Vb - Va/g. Shouldn't it be Va + V(from highest point to point b)/g ?
 

Attachments

  • 20210406_002400.jpg
    20210406_002400.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 140
Physics news on Phys.org
The question as quoted does not provide enough information. It says nothing about a speed or velocity at B, yet you say that forms part of the official answer.
Please be sure to quote the question exactly as given to you.

The given answer makes sense provided:
- you mean (Vb-Va)/g
- Va and Vb are the vertical components of velocity at A and B
But you quote the speed at A, which would include the horizontal component.
 
haruspex said:
The question as quoted does not provide enough information. It says nothing about a speed or velocity at B, yet you say that forms part of the official answer.
Please be sure to quote the question exactly as given to you.

The given answer makes sense provided:
- you mean (Vb-Va)/g
- Va and Vb are the vertical components of velocity at A and B
But you quote the speed at A, which would include the horizontal component.
The question is complete, I believe the author wanted to make this question a little bit more harder and trick into thinking there is a numerical answer since there was a second right answer with data which weren't mentioned in the problem.
Yes I was talking about y components. Could you explain why it is right? My thinking why t = (Vay + Vby)/g :
at the maximum point of the trajectory y velocity component becomes 0 and the projectile reaches speed Vby twice.
 
rbh said:
Yes I was talking about y components. Could you explain why it is right? My thinking why t = (Vay + Vby)/g :
at the maximum point of the trajectory y velocity component becomes 0 and the projectile reaches speed Vby twice.
Can I chip in? Maybe the problem is this: vay, vby and g are vectors. If you substitute actual values, the values for vby and for g will be negative (assuming upwards is positive). Try this:

Q1. Write an expression for the time it takes to go from A to the highest point. Check this will give a positive value.

Q2. Write an expression for the time is takes to go from the highest point to B. Check this will give a positive value.

Q3. If you add these two times, what do you get?

Q4. Can you see how to get the same answer simply by considering initial and final vertical velocities (without working out the two separate times)?
 
rbh said:
I believe the author wanted to make this question a little bit more harder
It is nonsensical to leave the solver to choose which variables are to be taken as given, whether as numbers or variable names. Instead of assuming the vertical velocities at A and B are known, you could assume the time is known, then just answer "t".
There has to be something in the problem statement that tells you which unknowns are allowed in the answer.
Steve4Physics said:
vay, vby and g are vectors.
Having specified y components, I see no advantage in taking them as vectors. Perhaps you meant that vA and vB are vectors, so ##\vec v_B-\vec v_A## would be a vertical vector? But that still doesn't let us divide by vector ##\vec g##.
 
haruspex said:
Having specified y components, I see no advantage in taking them as vectors. Perhaps you meant that vA and vB are vectors, so ##\vec v_B-\vec v_A## would be a vertical vector? But that still doesn't let us divide by vector ##\vec g##.
Yes. I could have expressed that better.

@rbh's formula "t = (Vay + Vby)/g" is inccorect and this looks like a result of dealing with signs/directions incorrectly. I wanted point @rbh in this direction [humour intended].
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top