Calculating Vertical +Horizontal Forces of Beam in Equilib.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating vertical and horizontal reactions at supports for two beams in equilibrium. The original poster expresses confusion regarding their calculations and the results provided by a software tool, LinPro, for Beam A.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up equilibrium equations for the beams, including summing forces and moments. They question the accuracy of their calculations compared to the software results.
  • Some participants suggest considering the direction of moments and the implications of support angles on the calculations.
  • Others raise questions about the interpretation of the beams' configurations and how they affect the equilibrium equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the problem setup and discussing the implications of support types and angles. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of moments and the need to account for the correct angles in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions specific values obtained from the software and expresses uncertainty about their correctness. There is also a note about the complexity introduced by the diagonal support and the need to consider both horizontal and vertical components in the calculations.

King_Silver
Messages
83
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Below are attached 2 beams, A and B. I have to calculate the vertical and horizontal reactions at both supports in both questions. I have done a lot of calculations and believe I have a good understanding of what is needed to be done however my forces are not balancing for some reason. We use a software called LinPro and for Beam A the following answers are given: Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN

Homework Equations


∑Ma = 0
∑Hf = 0
∑Vf = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I have set it up as follows.
Va + Vb = 60kN + 16kN (76kN)
The 16kN comes from 4kN* 4 from the diagonal force given.
I then took the moments about point A as follows.
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
5Vb = 202kN
Vb = 40.4kN which is NOT 36.54kN.

The horizontal forces are easy to calculate due to Vb being a roller support therefore Hb = 0 which ultimately means Ha = -12kN.

For the Support B!
Va+Vb = 50kN
Ha+Hb = 10kN (once again, Ha = -10kN because of the roller support at Hb = 0kN)

For this one however the support is at an angle. How to deal with supports at an angle? I figured it would just be Arctan(1/2) but that s giving me some strange answers which I know from just looking at aren't quite right.

Am I missing something crucial? I feel I must be overlooking something or are the answers I am calculating on Linpro software just incorrect and am I the one who is right? thanks
 

Attachments

  • wtututu.png
    wtututu.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 577
Physics news on Phys.org
King_Silver said:

Homework Statement


Below are attached 2 beams, A and B. I have to calculate the vertical and horizontal reactions at both supports in both questions. I have done a lot of calculations and believe I have a good understanding of what is needed to be done however my forces are not balancing for some reason. We use a software called LinPro and for Beam A the following answers are given: Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN

Homework Equations


∑Ma = 0
∑Hf = 0
∑Vf = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I have set it up as follows.
Va + Vb = 60kN + 16kN (76kN)
The 16kN comes from 4kN* 4 from the diagonal force given.
I then took the moments about point A as follows.
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
5Vb = 202kN
Vb = 40.4kN which is NOT 36.54kN.

You must account for the direction of the individual moments. About point A, the 20 kN dist. load will have a CW rotation as will the 16 kN component force at the end. The reaction Vb will have a CCW rotation.
The horizontal forces are easy to calculate due to Vb being a roller support therefore Hb = 0 which ultimately means Ha = -12kN.

For the Support B!
Va+Vb = 50kN
Ha+Hb = 10kN (once again, Ha = -10kN because of the roller support at Hb = 0kN)

For this one however the support is at an angle. How to deal with supports at an angle? I figured it would just be Arctan(1/2) but that s giving me some strange answers which I know from just looking at aren't quite right.

Am I missing something crucial? I feel I must be overlooking something or are the answers I am calculating on Linpro software just incorrect and am I the one who is right? thanks

For the support on a slope, you must use the correct angle which is normal to the ground. Arctan (1/2) is not the correct angle normal to the ground.
 
SteamKing said:
You must account for the direction of the individual moments. About point A, the 20 kN dist. load will have a CW rotation as will the 16 kN component force at the end. The reaction Vb will have a CCW rotation.
For the support on a slope, you must use the correct angle which is normal to the ground. Arctan (1/2) is not the correct angle normal to the ground.

So you're saying instead of (20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + (16kN*7) = 5Vb
How would that change my values though? or am I misunderstanding? Also, are the answers Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN correct for Beam A?

Normal to the ground.. a flat surface is 180 degrees. The support is at a diagonal so it will have both a Hf and Vf component no?
 
King_Silver said:
So you're saying instead of (20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + (16kN*7) = 5Vb
How would that change my values though? or am I misunderstanding? Also, are the answers Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN correct for Beam A?

Normal to the ground.. a flat surface is 180 degrees. The support is at a diagonal so it will have both a Hf and Vf component no?
I thought you had two separate beams. What you have is a 2-D frame. View A represents a longitudinal elevation of this frame, while view B is looking from say the 2m vertical bar toward the other end. The tiny circle at the end of the 20 kN/m dist. load shows where this 5 m horizontal side beam connects to the 7 m long beam.

Since this 5 m side beam is loaded, your equilibrium equations are affected, which is why your initial calculations weren't working out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: King_Silver
SteamKing said:
I thought you had two separate beams. What you have is a 2-D frame. View A represents a longitudinal elevation of this frame, while view B is looking from say the 2m vertical bar toward the other end. The tiny circle at the end of the 20 kN/m dist. load shows where this 5 m horizontal side beam connects to the 7 m long beam.

Since this 5 m side beam is loaded, your equilibrium equations are affected, which is why your initial calculations weren't working out.

Got it sorted! I forgot about the pin and realized where I was going wrong cheers for that!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K