Bohr Model applied to Excitons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Bohr Model to excitons in silicon (Si), treating excitons as hydrogen-like atoms. Key calculations include estimating the radius of an exciton as 4.2 nm and comparing it to the silicon interatomic distance of approximately 0.235 nm. The binding energy of the exciton is derived from the Rydberg energy, with the effective masses of the electron-hole pair being 0.15 times the electron mass. The gravitational potential energy is deemed negligible compared to the electrostatic potential energy in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of excitons and their properties in semiconductors
  • Familiarity with the Bohr Model and its application to atomic structures
  • Knowledge of effective mass concepts in solid-state physics
  • Basic grasp of electrostatics and potential energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "effective mass in semiconductors" for deeper insights into electron-hole dynamics
  • Study "Rydberg energy calculations" to understand binding energies in various systems
  • Explore "interatomic distances in silicon" to compare with exciton radii
  • Investigate "electrostatic vs gravitational potential energy" to understand their relative significance in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and semiconductor engineers interested in exciton behavior, binding energies, and the application of quantum mechanics to solid-state systems.

adamaero
Messages
109
Reaction score
1
An exciton is a bound electron-hole pair (in a semiconductor). For this problem, think of an exciton as a hydrogen-like atom, with a negatively charged electron and positively charged hole orbiting each other.

The permittivity of free space (ε0) is replaced with permittivity of the semiconductor (ε = 12).
The mass of the electron is replaced with the effective mass of the electron-hole pair.

1. Homework Statement (bold below is what I really need help on)

A) Estimate the radius in nm and the ground state energy in eV for an exciton in Si.

B) Approximately how large is the separation between atoms in a crystal of silicon? How does the radius compare with this number?

C) Silicon atoms have an average kinetic energy of T*kB. How does the exciton binding energy (E1) compare with this number? What does this mean?

D) All this is about electrostatic potential energy. Prove that it's reasonable to neglect the gravitational potential energy.

me = 9.1*10-31
eV = 1.602×10−19 J (N*m)
h = 6.626*10-34
ħ = 1.055*10-34
a0 = 0.0529 nm
ε*ε0 = 1.0359*10-10

permittivity of silicon = εSi = kSiε0 where k = dielectric constant

effective masses
me* = 0.26me
mh* = 0.36me

Homework Equations


r = mek2e4/(πħ3)

me*mh*/(me* + mh*) = 0.15me

r = n2h2*1.0359*10-10/(z*π*meffectivee2)

The Attempt at a Solution


A)
upload_2016-10-22_10-2-33.png


12*a0/0.15 = 4.2nm (n2/z)

upload_2016-10-22_10-3-17.png


Ry = -13.6eV

B) I do not remember chemistry much. How is the separation between silicon atoms found?

C) 300*1.38*10-23 m2kg/s2 = 4.14*10-23
E1 = ?

D) PEelectrostatic = kqQ/r
images.slideplayer.com/22/6421287/slides/slide_3.jpg
FE = qE
Fg = mg
∴ qE = mg
& as long as qE/m is much larger than g, gravity can be ignored.

Sources
http://www.course-notes.org/book/export/html/10891
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Exciton_energy_levels.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adamaero said:
Ry = -13.6eV
You get the same Rydberg constant as for hydrogen?

adamaero said:
B) I do not remember chemistry much. How is the separation between silicon atoms found?
Google :smile: There is no way to find that by first principles, so just Google "silicon interatomic distance".

adamaero said:
C) 300*1.38*10-23 m2kg/s2 = 4.14*10-23
E1 = ?
That should be the binding energy. Do you remember how to find that for hydrogen?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: adamaero
Oh yes, sorry, with ε:
The energy (for part A) is mee4/[8(h*1.0359*10-10)2]
= (9.1*10^-31)(e^4)/[8*((6.626*10^-34)*(1.0359*10^-10))^2]
= 1.32*1057
Was that suppose to be a different mass?

Thank you. I did Google it. Although, I either searched the wrong phrase or thought it wasn't simple from the results that came up earlier.
atomic radius = 0.132 nm
lattice parameter = 0.543 nm
nearest neighbor distance = 0.235 nm
Looks like the calculation before (4.2 nm) is wrong?

The binding energy of an electron to the nucleus in the hydrogen atom is 13.6 eV.
So the binding energy is the absolute value of Rydberg energy??
 
BE=(mp+me-mH)*c2
BE = (938MeV/c2 + 0.511MeV/c2 - 938.3MeV/c2)*c2 =
(938.484+ 0.511 - 938.783)*10^6
= 212keV

938.783 MeV (mass of hydrogen)
1.673e-27 kg (mass of proton)
>> 1 eV = 1.602e-19 J <<
>> 1 J = m3 kg / s2 <<
[(1.673e-27)/(1.602e-19)]*c2
= 9.3989e8
= 939.89e6
= 939.89 MeV
 
sol.

A) The 4.2nm (n2/z) is correct. The energy is found this way: E = m*e4/(8h2ε2), but
B) 0.235 nm or 0.543 nm means that there are multiple atoms in-between each
C) This is the same E1, but can be modified from more general E1 = me4/(8h2ε02) = -13.6 eV... E = E1*(mT/m)/[(ε/ε0)2]
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K