There is a well-known analysis of the distribution of particles by height in an isothermal atmosphere. It states that the probability of finding a particle at height ##h## is ##p(h) \propto e^{-\beta mgh}##, and then goes on to state that the number of particles at height ##h## is ##n(h) \propto e^{-\beta mgh}##.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is this not strictly incorrect, and merely an approximation? Surely we need to count the number of available states at each ##h##, and this will be proportional to the available volume in a thin shell at height ##h## i.e. we should have ##n(h) \propto f(h) e^{-\beta mgh}## where ##f(h)## measures the available volume? (This is because, roughly speaking, we can fit more molecules into a thin shell as ##h## increases.)

I'm guessing that this isn't done as ##h## doesn't vary much compared to the Earth's radius?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Boltzmann distribution: isothermal atmosphere error?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Boltzmann distribution isothermal | Date |
---|---|

I Inverse of Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution and Planck's Law? | Oct 8, 2016 |

I Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution | Sep 16, 2016 |

I Boltzmann distribution for spin-1/2 dipole: high T limit | May 5, 2016 |

I Volume of velocity-space in Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution | Apr 12, 2016 |

Derivation of the Boltzmann distribution (Dr. David Tong) | Mar 8, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**