Boltzmann equation and energy level occupancy at infinitely high temp

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the implications of the Boltzmann equation at infinitely high temperatures, particularly regarding energy level occupancy in hydrogen atoms and the transition to plasma states. Participants explore theoretical aspects and practical limitations of applying the Boltzmann equation across different temperature ranges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants interpret the Boltzmann equation at infinite temperature to suggest equal occupancy of energy levels, but question whether this holds true if hydrogen atoms become ionized.
  • Others argue that at sufficiently high temperatures, the energy levels change, and the Fermi energy in the Boltzmann equation is not constant, complicating its application.
  • There is a suggestion that the Boltzmann equation cannot be universally applied across all temperatures, particularly in the context of phase changes from atomic to plasma states.
  • One participant notes that the probability distribution for the hydrogen atom is not normalizable at high temperatures, indicating a limitation in the equation's applicability.
  • Another participant mentions that at high temperatures, the number of non-ionized hydrogen atoms is small but not zero, challenging the idea that all energy levels would be unoccupied.
  • There is a discussion about whether treatments of real plasma need to consider bound states, with some suggesting that they likely do not, focusing instead on the free motions of electrons and ions.
  • A participant points out a factor in the Boltzmann equation that becomes invalid at extremely high temperatures, indicating a need for caution in interpretation.
  • One participant emphasizes that at high temperatures, all states are approximately equally likely to be occupied, reflecting a different perspective on occupancy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the Boltzmann equation at high temperatures, particularly regarding ionization and energy level occupancy. There is no consensus on whether a universal Boltzmann equation exists for all temperature ranges, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on temperature and phase changes, as well as the non-normalizability of the probability distribution for certain systems at high temperatures.

Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Let's look at the Boltzmann equation
$$ \frac {p_{i}} {p_{j}} = e^{\frac{E_{j}-E_{i}} {kT}},$$

and take infinitely high temperature, the RHS becomes 1. I interpreted that this means every energy level is occupied by equal number of electrons. But if T is high enough, wouldn't the hydrogen atom be ionized and not a single energy level is occupied by an electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. You're in the domain of plasma physics ...

Haynes Kwon said:
every energy level is occupied by equal number of electrons
Namely zero
 
Why zero?
 
Haynes Kwon said:
if T is high enough, wouldn't the hydrogen atom be ionized and not a single energy level is occupied by an electron?

If T is high enough, the energy levels of the system change (for example, from those of a hydrogen atom to those of a free electron in a plasma), and hence the Fermi energy in the Boltzmann equation changes. So there is no single "Boltzmann equation" that applies at all temperatures.
 
PeterDonis said:
So there is no single "Boltzmann equation" that applies at all temperatures.
As a practical matter we are certainly incapable of writing down a Boltzmann equation valid for all temperatures. This seems to me to be different from your statement. Are you saying that no such equation exists in principal?? Please elucidate.
 
You can't apply that formalism to the hydrogen atom without modification of the problem since the probability distribution isn't normalizable.
 
hutchphd said:
re you saying that no such equation exists in principal?

I'm saying that the Boltzmann equation includes the Fermi energy, and the Fermi energy is not the same over the entire range of temperature from zero to infinity, because of phase changes like the change from atoms to plasma, which change the energy levels of the system. So you can't take, for example, the Boltzmann equation for the hydrogen atom, which includes the Fermi energy for that system, and apply it at temperatures which are high enough that the hydrogen will be ionized, because the Fermi energy is different in that temperature range.
 
Ah yes the phase change...thanks. Do treatments of real plasma need to include bound states (I profess total ignorance here) . It is called a fourth phase of matter for a reason... so little time ... so much to know.
 
hutchphd said:
Do treatments of real plasma need to include bound states

In general, probably not, since the relevant degrees of freedom are the free motions of the electrons and ions.
 
  • #10
hutchphd said:
Why zero?
Just from looking at the formula. There is a factor ##(kT)^{-{3\over 2}}## in front of the exponent.

Slighly sarcastic remark from my part, I must admit. Of course the formula itself goes invalid for extremely high ##T## as @PeterDonis pointed out.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Haynes Kwon said:
But if T is high enough, wouldn't the hydrogen atom be ionized and not a single energy level is occupied by an electron?
No. When temperature is high (but not infinite), the number of non-ionized atoms is small (but not zero).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and BvU
  • #12
The important physics in my opinion is that at high temperatures all states are approximately equally likely to be occupied.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K