Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I was doing some exercises from the book on curvature by Lee to buff up my differential geometry. I came a cross the following question and it seems to me the question isn't completely correct, but I'm not so good at differential geometry that I am confident. Maybe someone else is!

the question is:

Suppose N ⊂ M is an embedded submanifold.

If X is a vector ﬁeld on M , show that X is tangent to N at points

of N if and only if Xf = 0 whenever f is a smooth function on M that

vanishes on N.

What looks to be wrong is Xf only needs to vanish at points of N not all of M.

I came up with the example:

the vector field X=[itex]\partial_x[/itex] + y[itex]\partial_y[/itex] on M=ℝ² where the submanifold N is the real line (so set y to 0).

It seems that although at points of N X=[itex]\partial_x[/itex] (so at p \in N)

which is tangent to N.

the smooth function f(x,y)=y which vanishes on the real line has Xf=y so this only vanishes on N not on all of M.

So the question is is their something wrong with this reasoning or is the question wrong?

Thanks

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Book on Curvature wrong or am I confused

Loading...

Similar Threads for Book Curvature wrong |
---|

I Unproven statement in a book |

A Is the Berry connection a Levi-Civita connection? |

I On the Gaussian Curvature of time-like surfaces |

A On the dependence of the curvature tensor on the metric |

I About extrinsic curvature |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**