Book Recommendation for Ordinary Differrential Equations.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for introductory texts on ordinary differential equations, particularly those that adopt a geometric approach. Participants share their experiences with various books and express preferences based on clarity and teaching style.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant appreciates Arnold's Ordinary Differential Equations for its geometric approach but finds the presentation lacking.
  • Another participant strongly disagrees with using Arnold's book for teaching, describing it as too abstract and suggesting Zill's book as a clearer alternative, specifically recommending the sixth or seventh edition.
  • This participant also mentions Tenenbaum and Pollard as good options, though they express uncertainty about whether these books align with a geometric approach.
  • A third participant endorses Tenenbaum and Pollard, calling it fantastic.
  • The second participant notes that for graduate-level courses, Coddington and Levinson are frequently referenced by their teachers.
  • There is a general acknowledgment that while the recommended books may touch on geometric concepts, it is unclear if they fully meet the request for a geometric approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the suitability of Arnold's book, with some advocating for alternatives like Zill and Tenenbaum and Pollard. There is no consensus on which book best fulfills the request for a geometric approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of clarity in the presentation of material and the potential variability in editions of recommended texts, which may affect their suitability.

caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
I am doing my first course in Differential Equations and the book the instructor is teaching from is Arnold's Ordinary Differential Equations.
I like the geometric approach taken in the book but I don't like the way the material has been presented.
Can somebody please suggest me another introductory text on ordinary differential equations which takes a geometric approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would never, ever, teach Introductory Differential Equations from Arnold's book! It looks much too abstract for me. Ironic, considering Arnold was the one who came up with that fantastic quote. (See the footnote at the bottom of page 1 of http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~eitan/menger.pdf.)

I would probably use Zill for an introduction to DE's. Warning, though: I used the sixth edition, and later editions do not appear to be as clear. Go with sixth or seventh. Another great option is Tenenbaum and Pollard.

For a graduate-level course, my teachers (multiple teachers!) kept saying, "Well, that's in Coddington and Levinson". So, there you go.

I'm afraid I haven't at all fundamentally answered your question about a geometric approach. I have no idea whether the books I've recommended would qualify as "a geometric approach". Certainly they appeal to geometry - all of them - from time-to-time. You've got to get a handle on basic solution techniques before you go further - that's my view. And certainly Zill, with Tenenbaum and Pollard as a supplement, would fit that bill.
 
I second Tenenbaum and Polland. Fantastic! :)
 
Ackbach said:
I would never, ever, teach Introductory Differential Equations from Arnold's book! It looks much too abstract for me. Ironic, considering Arnold was the one who came up with that fantastic quote. (See the footnote at the bottom of page 1 of http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~eitan/menger.pdf.)

I would probably use Zill for an introduction to DE's. Warning, though: I used the sixth edition, and later editions do not appear to be as clear. Go with sixth or seventh. Another great option is Tenenbaum and Pollard.

For a graduate-level course, my teachers (multiple teachers!) kept saying, "Well, that's in Coddington and Levinson". So, there you go.

I'm afraid I haven't at all fundamentally answered your question about a geometric approach. I have no idea whether the books I've recommended would qualify as "a geometric approach". Certainly they appeal to geometry - all of them - from time-to-time. You've got to get a handle on basic solution techniques before you go further - that's my view. And certainly Zill, with Tenenbaum and Pollard as a supplement, would fit that bill.
Thank you so much Achbach and Fantini for the recommendations!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K