MHB Book Recommendation for Ordinary Differrential Equations.

caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
I am doing my first course in Differential Equations and the book the instructor is teaching from is Arnold's Ordinary Differential Equations.
I like the geometric approach taken in the book but I don't like the way the material has been presented.
Can somebody please suggest me another introductory text on ordinary differential equations which takes a geometric approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would never, ever, teach Introductory Differential Equations from Arnold's book! It looks much too abstract for me. Ironic, considering Arnold was the one who came up with that fantastic quote. (See the footnote at the bottom of page 1 of http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~eitan/menger.pdf.)

I would probably use Zill for an introduction to DE's. Warning, though: I used the sixth edition, and later editions do not appear to be as clear. Go with sixth or seventh. Another great option is Tenenbaum and Pollard.

For a graduate-level course, my teachers (multiple teachers!) kept saying, "Well, that's in Coddington and Levinson". So, there you go.

I'm afraid I haven't at all fundamentally answered your question about a geometric approach. I have no idea whether the books I've recommended would qualify as "a geometric approach". Certainly they appeal to geometry - all of them - from time-to-time. You've got to get a handle on basic solution techniques before you go further - that's my view. And certainly Zill, with Tenenbaum and Pollard as a supplement, would fit that bill.
 
I second Tenenbaum and Polland. Fantastic! :)
 
Ackbach said:
I would never, ever, teach Introductory Differential Equations from Arnold's book! It looks much too abstract for me. Ironic, considering Arnold was the one who came up with that fantastic quote. (See the footnote at the bottom of page 1 of http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~eitan/menger.pdf.)

I would probably use Zill for an introduction to DE's. Warning, though: I used the sixth edition, and later editions do not appear to be as clear. Go with sixth or seventh. Another great option is Tenenbaum and Pollard.

For a graduate-level course, my teachers (multiple teachers!) kept saying, "Well, that's in Coddington and Levinson". So, there you go.

I'm afraid I haven't at all fundamentally answered your question about a geometric approach. I have no idea whether the books I've recommended would qualify as "a geometric approach". Certainly they appeal to geometry - all of them - from time-to-time. You've got to get a handle on basic solution techniques before you go further - that's my view. And certainly Zill, with Tenenbaum and Pollard as a supplement, would fit that bill.
Thank you so much Achbach and Fantini for the recommendations!
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K