Book recommendations for learning QM

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
Quantum_C
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear All,
I am interested in learning quantum mechanics for curiosity.
I know the basics from different sources and I've read the Quantum Mechanics (the theoretical minimum) book for Leonard Susskind and Art Friedman. What would you recommend as a book to further understand and learn quantum mechanics ?
I am looking for a nice book with explanations and equations but I do not need/want to go very deep in mathematics.
Any recommendations ?

Many thanks.

With kind regards
 
on Phys.org
Feynman's QED - The Strange Theory Of Light And Matter

G. Venkataraman's The Quantum Revolution series:
Volume 1 - The Breakthrough
Volume 2 - QED - The Jewel of Physics
Volume 3 - What is Reality?
 
I would recommend Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David Griffiths.

If you can get the third edition do it but the second is also great and available online (including problems and solutions).

I started learning QM from it and even my Math background is far from great I could understand the Math on it because every fundamental concept (in my opinion of course) is treated in detail.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and PeroK
Susskind is good as you know:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465062903/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You do need calculus though. I often recommend the following for that, but since I have a degree in math just looked at an an online copy rather than got one. But as I suggest it so much got a copy - its even better than than I thought it would be:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471827223/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You can do it in a weekend. In the US system you just need algebra and geometry, in Australia grade 9 or even grade 8 math is enough. I honestly believe calculus can be taught a lot earlier than it usually is, but that is another story.

Its good enough background for Boas's book on mathematics for physicists, engineers etc:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471198269/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You do not need it for Susskind, or probably even Griffiths, but beyond that its probably a good idea to do that first.

My suggestion is Griffith's, then Sakuari:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805382917/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Then Boas, then Ballentine:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805382917/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: smodak and JD_PM
bhobba said:
Susskind is good as you know:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465062903/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You do need calculus though. I often recommend the following for that, but since I have a degree in math just looked at an an online copy rather than got one. But as I suggest it so much got a copy - its even better than than I thought it would be:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471827223/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You can do it in a weekend. In the US system you just need algebra and geometry, in Australia grade 9 or even grade 8 math is enough. I honestly believe calculus can be taught a lot earlier than it usually is, but that is another story.

Its good enough background for Boas's book on mathematics for physicists, engineers etc:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471198269/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You do not need it for Susskind, or probably even Griffiths, but beyond that its probably a good idea to do that first.

My suggestion is Griffith's, then Sakuari:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805382917/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Then Boas, then Ballentine:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805382917/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Thanks
Bill
Really great advise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba