Book recommendations for self studying calculus.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for self-studying calculus, focusing on various textbooks and their suitability for learners with different backgrounds. Participants share their thoughts on the progression from basic calculus to more advanced mathematical analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests several textbooks including Michael Spivak, Tom Apostol, Walter Rudin, and Richard Courant for advancing calculus knowledge.
  • Another participant agrees with the recommendations but cautions that starting with Rudin may not be beneficial for those without a solid calculus foundation.
  • Questions arise regarding what constitutes an "average" level of calculus knowledge and what prerequisites might be necessary before tackling Apostol.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of being comfortable with proofs before engaging with Apostol, although it is noted that prior calculus knowledge is not strictly necessary.
  • One participant expresses intent to learn about proofs using "How to Prove It" by Daniel J. Velleman, indicating a desire to build foundational skills.
  • Another participant recommends "How to Solve It" by George Polya as a complementary resource for learning problem-solving techniques alongside proofs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of the recommended textbooks, but there is no consensus on the necessary prerequisites for tackling Apostol or Rudin. The discussion reflects varying opinions on the importance of prior calculus knowledge and comfort with proofs.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on what constitutes "average" calculus knowledge and the varying interpretations of the prerequisites for advanced texts. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in self-studying calculus and mathematical analysis, particularly those seeking recommendations for textbooks and guidance on foundational skills.

kanderson
I can do calculus on a normal level from high school now but I would like to further myself. I was recommended Michael Spivak 4th Edition...Tom Apostol 1st and 2nd edition...Walter Rudin Mathematical Analysis 3rd Edition...Richard Courant 1 and 2 calculus/analysis introduction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are the best recommendations, in my opinion. If you do Spivak/Apostol/Courant well then you can pass on to Rudin. Starting with it won't teach you calculus and you have a good chance of enduring a major hard time. The purpose of mathematical analysis is to give a rigorous foundations for calculus and be one of the first courses to keep you accostumed to the mathematics you'll face from thereby on, so you will be skipping all the computational parts, physical interpretations, etc.

Of course, I'm assuming an average level calculus, but since I have no idea how far you went you may as well try reading Rudin a bit and see if you can handle.
 
Thank you fantini. Could you describe average calculus or what I should have to know before I try apostol?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good questions are how comfortable are you with proofs, can you follow most, possibly all, of them? Technically you don't need to know calculus before you try apostol, but most people agree that a first exposure softens a great deal the pain.
 
Thank you fantini...I will start learning proofs from a How to Prove it Structured approach by Daniel J Velleman
 
Another excellent recommendation about that is the classic "How to Solve it", by George Polya. It's fabulous, I'd say read them both at the same time.
 
I have that one somewhere, I shall go find it :D Thank you for reminding me I had that book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K