Bouncing ball and Doppler effect

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a ball emitting sound waves at a frequency of 430 Hz while bouncing between two parallel reflective walls spaced 0.8 m apart. The observer detects a beat frequency of 5 Hz, leading to the calculation of the ball's speed, which is determined to be 1.98 m/s. Additionally, to generate standing waves with a frequency equal to twice the fundamental frequency, the ball must travel at 4 m/s. The Doppler effect is crucial in understanding the frequency changes due to the ball's motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Doppler effect in sound waves
  • Understanding of standing waves
  • Basic principles of wave interference
  • Knowledge of sound speed in air (340 m/s)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Doppler effect in various contexts, including moving sources and observers.
  • Explore the conditions for standing wave formation in different mediums.
  • Investigate wave interference patterns and their applications in acoustics.
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of sound waves and their propagation.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, acoustics, and the Doppler effect. This discussion is also beneficial for educators seeking to explain these concepts in a practical context.

Soren4
Messages
127
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider two parallel walls perfectly reflective placed at the distance ##d = 0.8 m ##. A ball, provided with a device through which are emitted continuously frequency sound waves equal to ##f_0=430 Hz##, is launched from one wall to another. It moves with constant velocity ##v##. After some time, an observer placed at the position where the ball was thrown a beat frequency equal to ##5 Hz##.
Compute:

a) the speed of the ball;

b) assuming the formation of standing waves when the two walls are made the same traveling conditions (nodes) of the gas particles, determine the speed at which must travel the ball so that between the two walls standing waves will be generated with frequency equal to twice the fundamental frequency. Neglect, in this calculation, the higher frequency sound wave presence.

Assume the speed of sound ##c = 340 m / s##.

[Results: a) ## v = 1.98 m / s ##; b) ## v = 4 m / s ##]

Homework Equations


Doppler effect : $$f^*=f_0(\frac{c}{c\pm v_{ball}})$$

The Attempt at a Solution



a. I get confused because the result is correct if I use
$$f_{beats}=|f_0(\frac{c}{c- v_{ball}})-f_0(\frac{c}{c+v_{ball}})|$$
But this does not seem correct to me. Immediately after the first bounce the ball i moving towards the observer, so it should be
$$f_{beats}=|f_0(\frac{c}{c- v_{ball}})-f_0(\frac{c}{c-v_{ball}})|=0$$

Which of course is not.

b. This is the point I cannot do at all. What is the strategy to use here?

Any help is really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soren4 said:

Homework Statement


Consider two parallel walls perfectly reflective placed at the distance ##d = 0.8 m ##. A ball, provided with a device through which are emitted continuously frequency sound waves equal to ##f_0=430 Hz##, is launched from one wall to another. It moves with constant velocity ##v##. After some time, an observer placed at the position where the ball was thrown a beat frequency equal to ##5 Hz##.
Compute:

a) the speed of the ball;

b) assuming the formation of standing waves when the two walls are made the same traveling conditions (nodes) of the gas particles, determine the speed at which must travel the ball so that between the two walls standing waves will be generated with frequency equal to twice the fundamental frequency. Neglect, in this calculation, the higher frequency sound wave presence.

Assume the speed of sound ##c = 340 m / s##.

[Results: a) ## v = 1.98 m / s ##; b) ## v = 4 m / s ##]

Homework Equations


Doppler effect : $$f^*=f_0(\frac{c}{c\pm v_{ball}})$$

The Attempt at a Solution



a. I get confused because the result is correct if I use
$$f_{beats}=|f_0(\frac{c}{c- v_{ball}})-f_0(\frac{c}{c+v_{ball}})|$$
But this does not seem correct to me. Immediately after the first bounce the ball i moving towards the observer, so it should be
$$f_{beats}=|f_0(\frac{c}{c- v_{ball}})-f_0(\frac{c}{c-v_{ball}})|=0$$

Which of course is not.

The ball continuously emits sound. The sound also reflects from the wall, so the observer hears the sounds emitted by both the receding and approaching balls.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Soren4
ehild said:
The ball continuously emits sound. The sound also reflects from the wall, so the observer hears the sounds emitted by both the receding and approaching balls.

Thanks for the reply!

I thought about the problem for a while, I'm totally ok with point a. now, but point b. is still a mistery for me.

How does the speed of the ball influences the formation of standing waves?

The frequency twice of the fundamental is ##f=2 \frac{c}{2d}## but the ball emits at ##f_0## regardless its velocity.

So can I deal with point b?
 
The
Soren4 said:
How does the speed of the ball influences the formation of standing waves?

The frequency twice of the fundamental is ##f=2 \frac{c}{2d}## but the ball emits at ##f_0## regardless its velocity.

So can I deal with point b?
The speed of the ball influences the frequency of the sound waves which propagate in air forward and backward between the walls. These two waves generate the standing wave. The problem says to neglect the higher frequency wave. So you have sound wave of frequency f*=f0 c/(c+v), find v.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Soren4
ehild said:
The

The speed of the ball influences the frequency of the sound waves which propagate in air forward and backward between the walls. These two waves generate the standing wave. The problem says to neglect the higher frequency wave. So you have sound wave of frequency f*=f0 c/(c+v), find v.

Thanks for the reply! I thought about it again and I understood your solution, except one thing.

The ball is continuosly emitting, so the reflected waves interfere not only with the other reflected waves, but also with the waves just emitted by the moving ball, don't they? So shouldn't this be taken into account? I mean the ball should have a velocity such that it does not emit at all when it is in the position of a node and emits when it is on an antinode?

Maybe that's a wrong complication to the problem that I'm thinking about, but is it really only necessary to use doppler effect and neglect the fact that the ball is continously emitting?
 
Soren4 said:
Thanks for the reply! I thought about it again and I understood your solution, except one thing.

The ball is continuosly emitting, so the reflected waves interfere not only with the other reflected waves, but also with the waves just emitted by the moving ball, don't they? So shouldn't this be taken into account? I mean the ball should have a velocity such that it does not emit at all when it is in the position of a node and emits when it is on an antinode?
No, the ball emits continuously at frequency fo=430 Hz. The emitted sound makes sound waves traveling in air at higher frequency in the direction of the velocity of the ball, and at lower frequency in the opposite direction. The sound emitted by the ball is connected to the vibration of the ball or some part of it, but the sound wave traveling in the air is connected to vibration of air molecules.
It is the sound wave traveling in air that reflects from the walls and interfere with the sound wave traveling in opposite direction.
Soren4 said:
Maybe that's a wrong complication to the problem that I'm thinking about, but is it really only necessary to use doppler effect and neglect the fact that the ball is continously emitting?
Yes, it would be enough to consider only the sound wave emitted at an instant, and ignoring the emitting ball. But that wave would extinct in a short time. The continuous emission of sound ensures constant intensity, making the formation of standing waves possible.
There are sound waves with two different frequencies, but the problem says to ignore the one with higher frequency. And the conditions correspond to standing wave formation for one frequency only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Soren4

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
849
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K