Bound charges and electric displacement.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a coaxial cable with a dielectric material, where the task is to find the bound charges using two different methods. The context is rooted in electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields in materials with dielectric properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the electric displacement, electric field, and potential to find bound charges, while also exploring a second method involving potential differentiation. Some participants question the definition of bound surface charges, suggesting they should only apply at specific radii (s = a or s = b), and mention the existence of bound volume charge density in the dielectric region.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of where bound charges are defined and the implications of the signs of the charges based on conductor polarity. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some participants are confirming each other's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the behavior of bound charges in a coaxial configuration and the conditions under which these charges are defined, particularly in relation to the dielectric properties and the geometry of the setup.

-Dragoon-
Messages
308
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A certain coaxial cable consists of copper wire, radius a, surrounded by a concentric copper wire of outer radius b. The space between is filled with a dielectric with a relative permittivity of \epsilon_{r} = \frac{s}{a}, a \leq s \leq b Find the bound charges by using two different methods.



The Attempt at a Solution



First I'll find the electric displacement, the field, and the potential:

\oint D\cdot da = Q_{f_{enc.}} => D(2\pi sl) = Q =>D = \frac{Q}{2\pi sl}

Then I find the field from the displacement:

E = \frac{D}{\epsilon} = \frac{D}{\epsilon_{0} \epsilon_{r}} = \frac{a}{s^{2}}\frac{Q}{2\pi \epsilon_0 l}

Then, finally, the potential:


-\int_s^a E\cdot dI = \frac{Qa}{2\pi \epsilon_0 l}\int_a^s \frac{ds}{s^{2}} = \frac{Qa}{2\pi \epsilon_{0} l}(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{s})

Now for the bound charges:

P = D - \epsilon_{0}E = \frac{Q}{2\pi sl}\hat{r} - \frac{a}{s^{2}}\frac{Q}{2\pi l}\hat{r} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{s^{2}})\hat{r}

The surface bound charge is:
\sigma_{b} = P\cdot\hat{n} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{s^{2}})

Now, when I calculate it using a different method which involves the potential:

\sigma_{b} = -\epsilon_{0}( \frac{\partial V_{out}}{\partial s} - \frac{\partial V_{in}}{\partial s}) = -\epsilon_{0}(\frac{Q}{2\pi \epsilon_{0} l}\frac{a}{s^{2}} - 0) = -\frac{Q}{2\pi l}\frac{a}{s^{2}}

Which gives one of the terms correctly, but the other term is clearly missing from here. Any hints on where I'm going wrong in this? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-Dragoon- said:
The surface bound charge is:
\sigma_{b} = P\cdot\hat{n} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{s^{2}})

Shouldn't the bound surface charge only be defined for s = a or s = b?

Also, there will be a bound volume charge density ρb for a < s < b.
 
TSny said:
Shouldn't the bound surface charge only be defined for s = a or s = b?

Also, there will be a bound volume charge density ρb for a < s < b.

Interesting, so then for s = a, the bound charges are zero? And for s = b, we have:

\sigma_{b} = - \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{b} - \frac{a}{b^{2}})
 
Yes, that looks right to me, except I get the opposite sign. I guess the sign depends on which conductor carries positive Q.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
TSny said:
Yes, that looks right to me, except I get the opposite sign. I guess the sign depends on which conductor carries positive Q.

Alright I see, thanks for the help once again, TSny.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K