Bound charges and electric displacement.

4 replies · 2K views · last reply
-Dragoon-
Messages
308
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A certain coaxial cable consists of copper wire, radius a, surrounded by a concentric copper wire of outer radius b. The space between is filled with a dielectric with a relative permittivity of [tex]\epsilon_{r} = \frac{s}{a}, a \leq s \leq b[/tex] Find the bound charges by using two different methods.



The Attempt at a Solution



First I'll find the electric displacement, the field, and the potential:

[tex]\oint D\cdot da = Q_{f_{enc.}} => D(2\pi sl) = Q =>D = \frac{Q}{2\pi sl}[/tex]

Then I find the field from the displacement:

[tex]E = \frac{D}{\epsilon} = \frac{D}{\epsilon_{0} \epsilon_{r}} = \frac{a}{s^{2}}\frac{Q}{2\pi \epsilon_0 l}[/tex]

Then, finally, the potential:


[tex]-\int_s^a E\cdot dI = \frac{Qa}{2\pi \epsilon_0 l}\int_a^s \frac{ds}{s^{2}} = \frac{Qa}{2\pi \epsilon_{0} l}(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{s})[/tex]

Now for the bound charges:

[tex]P = D - \epsilon_{0}E = \frac{Q}{2\pi sl}\hat{r} - \frac{a}{s^{2}}\frac{Q}{2\pi l}\hat{r} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{s^{2}})\hat{r}[/tex]

The surface bound charge is:
[tex]\sigma_{b} = P\cdot\hat{n} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{s^{2}})[/tex]

Now, when I calculate it using a different method which involves the potential:

[tex]\sigma_{b} = -\epsilon_{0}( \frac{\partial V_{out}}{\partial s} - \frac{\partial V_{in}}{\partial s}) = -\epsilon_{0}(\frac{Q}{2\pi \epsilon_{0} l}\frac{a}{s^{2}} - 0) = -\frac{Q}{2\pi l}\frac{a}{s^{2}}[/tex]

Which gives one of the terms correctly, but the other term is clearly missing from here. Any hints on where I'm going wrong in this? Thanks in advance.
 
-Dragoon- said:
The surface bound charge is:
[tex]\sigma_{b} = P\cdot\hat{n} = \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{s^{2}})[/tex]

Shouldn't the bound surface charge only be defined for s = a or s = b?

Also, there will be a bound volume charge density ρb for a < s < b.
 
TSny said:
Shouldn't the bound surface charge only be defined for s = a or s = b?

Also, there will be a bound volume charge density ρb for a < s < b.

Interesting, so then for s = a, the bound charges are zero? And for s = b, we have:

[tex]\sigma_{b} = - \frac{Q}{2\pi l}(\frac{1}{b} - \frac{a}{b^{2}})[/tex]
 
Yes, that looks right to me, except I get the opposite sign. I guess the sign depends on which conductor carries positive Q.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
TSny said:
Yes, that looks right to me, except I get the opposite sign. I guess the sign depends on which conductor carries positive Q.

Alright I see, thanks for the help once again, TSny.