Boundary conditions in Ansys

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriate boundary conditions to apply in a Static Structural simulation using Ansys for a support subjected to various loading conditions. Participants explore modeling techniques and considerations for accurately representing the mechanical behavior of the support under specified loads.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about which displacement and rotation components should be fixed or free when defining boundary conditions for the support, given the loading conditions.
  • Another participant suggests adding simplified models of the bolts for higher accuracy, proposing that beam elements with rigid links could be sufficient instead of solid representations.
  • A different participant shares their experience modeling similar parts by applying a force equal to the bolt preload on the area contacted by the bolt head, recommending a very stiff spring constant to simulate the bolt preload force while allowing for deformation.
  • A follow-up response clarifies that the original poster is not considering the bolts in their simulation and reiterates the need to determine the fixed or free components for boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing viewpoints on the necessity and method of modeling bolts in the simulation, with no consensus reached on the best approach to defining boundary conditions for the support.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of accurately modeling boundary conditions in finite element analysis, with considerations for both displacement and rotation constraints remaining unresolved.

clab
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi, I have one question related to the boundary conditions I should apply in a Static Structural simulation for the following support.
1638649295866.png

The support is subjected to the following loading conditions shown below.

1638649399115.png

  • Interface 1: 0.75 inch diameter pin. The pin is to be considered infinitely stiff.
  • Interfaces 2 – 5: 0.375-24 AS3239-26 machine bolt. Nut face 0.405 in. max ID and 0.558 in. min OD. The bolts are to be considered infinitely stiff.
  • Load Conditions:
  • 1. Max static linear load of 8,000 lbs vertical up.
  • 2. Max static linear load of 8,500 lbs horizontal out.
  • 3. Max static linear load of 9,500 lbs 42 degrees from vertical.
  • 4. Max static torsional load of 5,000 lb-in horizontal at intersection of centerline of pin and midpoint between clevis arms.

When performing the support edge condition by applying the remote displacement, I must consider the constraints generated by the bolts on both displacement and rotation. Which displacement and rotation components should be free or fixed? (as shown in the last screenshot).
OA2Y4TSVO2C6.png


O93EUHW0FS0F.png


I am considering that the screw only makes contact/pressure with the bracket on the face of the countersunk hole. as shown in the following image.

DX58KTFB7ISF.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Engineering news on Phys.org
It would be best to add simplified models of the bolts for higher accuracy. You don’t even have to use solid representation, beam elements with rigid links may suffice. There is an interesting book published last year that discusses bolt modeling in detail, among other topics: "Practical Finite Element Analysis for Mechanical Engineers" by D. Madier.
 
I have modeled similar parts by specifying a force equal to bolt preload force on the area contacted by the bolt head, and a distributed spring under the base. The spring constant needs to be quite stiff, on the order of 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 lbs/inch/inch^2. The spring constant can be limited to a region around each bolt of about twice the bolt head diameter. That simulates the bolt preload force, while allowing the part to deform similar to the real part bolted to a solid surface, and avoiding modelling contact.
 
Thanks for your answer, but for the simulation I am not considering the bolt, I am only considering the support in question, my question is which are the displacement and rotation components should be fixed or free to define the boundary conditions of the system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
28K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K