Boundary conditions ##\vec{B}## and ##\vec{H}##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the boundary conditions for magnetic fields represented by the equations ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B} = 0## and ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{H} = - \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{M}##. Key points include the necessity of considering both perpendicular and parallel components of the magnetic field and magnetization, specifically ##B_{2\perp} - B_{1\perp} = 0## and ##H_{2\parallel} - H_{1\parallel} = \vec{K}_f \times \hat{n}##. The discussion also emphasizes that the curls of the vectors may not be necessary for this treatment, as it pertains to surface current models in magnetostatics. Additionally, it suggests that Legendre's method is not required for solving this problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations, specifically in magnetostatics.
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly divergence and curl operations.
  • Knowledge of surface current models in electromagnetism.
  • Basic concepts of magnetization and its effects on magnetic fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Stokes' theorem in electromagnetism.
  • Study the surface current model in detail to understand its implications on boundary conditions.
  • Explore Legendre's method and its relevance in solving magnetostatics problems.
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetization and magnetic field components in different materials.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those focusing on magnetostatics and boundary condition analysis.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Find boundary conditions ##\vec{B}## and ##\vec{H}## for a cylinder of radius a and length 4a and ##\vec{M} = M\hat{z}## on the axis of the cylinder
Relevant Equations
##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B} = 0##
##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{H} = - \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{M}##
##\vec{\nabla} x \vec{B} = \mu_0 \vec{J}##
##\vec{\nabla} x \vec{H} = \mu_0 \vec{J}_f##
When asking for boundary conditions I'm wondering if this is enough in this situation to give
##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B} = 0 , B_{2\perp} - B_{1 \perp} = 0##
##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{H} = - \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{M}, H_{2\perp} - H_{1 \perp} = - (M_{2\perp} - M_{1 \perp})##
##\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B} = \mu_0 \vec{J}, B_{2\||} - B_{1 \||} = \mu_0 \vec{K} \times \hat{n}##
##\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{H} = \mu_0 \vec{J}_f , H_{2 \||} - H_{1 \||} = \vec{K}_f \times \hat{n}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It probably isn't necessary to include anything about the curls of the vectors, because that is a surface current type treatment that is completely separate from the pole model of magnetostatics. Meanwhile, what do you know about ## M_{2 \, perpendicular} ## ? =if it is outside of the material? For the ## M_{in \, perpendicular} ##, it is ## -M ## on the left endface, and ## +M ## on the right endface.

Edit: Scratch part of that=I think they may be looking for boundary conditions everywhere on the surface, (they aren't completely clear here=do they want just the on-axis conditions? ), and it may be useful to employ the surface current model to get the conditions for the parallel components.

It may be worth mentioning that this problem has two very standard ways of solving it, and Legendre's method with boundary conditions are not needed to solve it. See https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/a-magnetostatics-problem-of-interest-2.971045/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
a follow-on: It still needs a little work, but let's get started using ## \nabla \times \vec{H}=\vec{J}_{free}=0 ##. Using Stokes theorem on this, what can you say about the parallel components of ## \vec{H} ## anywhere on the entire surface, i.e. ## H_{out \, parallel} ## and ## H_{in \, parallel} ##?
 
Finally find it, thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K