Boundary Value Problems for Second Order Differential Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Second order
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around boundary value problems for second order differential equations, specifically focusing on a given differential equation and its solutions. Participants are exploring various methods to solve the equation, including the Frobenius method and series expansions, while also addressing boundary conditions and Sturm-Liouville forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Frobenius method due to singularities and express uncertainty about the simplification of their series expansions. Some question the nature of the forcing function and whether it should be zero. Others explore the implications of the indicial equation and the need for a second solution when roots differ by an integer.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and findings. Some have identified potential solutions and methods, while others express confusion and seek clarification on specific steps. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under constraints typical of homework assignments, including specific boundary conditions and the requirement to express solutions in particular forms. There is also mention of the complexity of the integrals involved and the challenges in finding particular solutions.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


1)Calculate the general solution of [itex]y''+\frac{y'x}{1+x}-\frac{y}{1+x}=1+x[/itex].
2)What behavior do the solutions have in [itex]x=-1[/itex]?
3)Solve the boundary problem to the DE in the interval [0,1] with [itex]y(0)=0[/itex] and [itex]y(1)+y'(1)=0[/itex].
4)Write down the DE under Sturm-Liouville's form and find a Green function for the DE with the boundary conditions in 3) over the interval [0,1]. Then solve the DE using Green's function.
Hint:Use solutions [itex]y_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2[/itex] such that [itex]y_1(0)=0 \neq y_2 (0)[/itex] and [itex]y_2 (1)+y _2 '(1)=0 \neq y_1 (1)+y_1 ' (1)[/itex].

Homework Equations



For part 1, not sure.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to apply Frobenius method because of the singularity of the DE in [itex]x=-1[/itex].
I reached [itex]\sum _{n=0}^ \infty (n+c)(n+c-1)a_n(x-1)^{n+c+2}+ \frac{x}{1+x}\sum _{n=0}^ \infty (n+c)a_n (x-1)^{n+c-1}- \frac{1}{1+x} \sum _{n=0}^ \infty a_n (x-1)^{n+c}=1+x[/itex].
Noting really simplifies well, if I continue further I think I'll have problems in finding a recurrence relation that could be useful. I wonder if I'm not doing things wrong so far and if I should continue this way.

Edit: this is not going well at all, my right hand side is different from 0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (1), i think the forcing function or free term should be zero.

The first step would be to write up the auxiliary equation and solve.

I get: [tex]m=-1 \; or\; m=\frac{1}{x+1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
sharks said:
For part (1), the forcing function or free term should be zero.

Write up the auxiliary equation and solve.

Thanks for helping me. I never met such terms before. If google helped me well, you mean that there's a function of only the variable x that should be 0?
What I reached is [itex](x-1)^{c-2}a_0c(c-1)+(x-1)^{c-1}a_1 (c-1)c +\frac{x}{1+x} (x-1)^{c-1} c a_0 + \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } (x-1)^{n+c} [a_{n+2}(n+c+2)(n+1+c)+\frac{x}{1+x} (n+c+1)a_{n+1}- \frac{a_n}{x+1}] = 1+x[/itex]. I don't know where is the free term nor why a term should be 0.
 
I haven't made much progress on this DE. I tried several ways, even with a friend. He told me apparently that the solution can only be kept as an integral though the integral is so horrible that even the basic special functions wouldn't help.
On my own I've attempted to solve the homogeneous DE [itex]y''+\frac{y'x}{1+x}-\frac{y}{1+x}=0[/itex] via infinite series expansions.
I reached that [itex]y_1 (z)= \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } \frac{(-1)^nz^n}{n!}[/itex] and [itex]y_2 (z)= \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } \frac{(-1)^n z^{n+2}}{(n+1)!}[/itex]. I do not recognize any function I know in these 2 linearly independent solutions. By the way here [itex]z=x+1[/itex].
Now in order to find the particular solution to the general DE [itex]y''+\frac{y'x}{1+x}-\frac{y}{1+x}=1+x[/itex] I must calculate the wronskian of [itex]y_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2[/itex], which seems way too aweful to even be attempted.
However according to wolfram alpha, the general solution is of the form [itex]y(x)=Ae^{-x}+Bx+Cx^2+D[/itex].
Hmm now that I think about it, my solution [itex]y_1(z)=e^{-z}[/itex]. But I'm still unsure about my [itex]y_2(z)[/itex]. Any help is immensely appreciated on how to proceed further.
 
For part (1): The general solution of the reduced equation is: [tex]y_c = Ae^{x/(1+x)}+Be^{-x}[/tex]
The Wronskian is: [tex]\frac{x^2+2x+2}{(1+x)^2}[/tex]
 
Ok thanks a lot, it means I've got one solution to the homogeneous problem right; the other wrong. I've spotted one error but even when corrected, the other solution to the DE doesn't match [itex]Ae^{x/(1+x)}[/itex].
Thus I fear I have to show every single steps I've made.
Let [itex]z=x+1[/itex] so that the orignal DE becomes [itex]y''+ \frac{(z-1)y'}{z}-\frac{y}{z}=0[/itex]. I propose a solution of the form [itex]y(z)= \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } a_n z^{n+c} \Rightarrow y'(z)=y''(z)=\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } (n+c) a_n z^{n+c-1} \Rightarrow \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } (n+c) (n+c-1) a_n z^{n+c-2}[/itex].
Now I replace those series into the DE:
[itex]\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } (n+c) (n+c-1) a_n z^{n+c-2}+\frac{(z-1)}{z}\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } (n+c) a_n z^{n+c-1}- \frac{1}{z} \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } a_n z^{n+c}=0[/itex].
Developping a bit:
[itex]\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } (n+c) (n+c-1) a_n z^{n+c-2}+\sum _{n=0}^{\infty } (n+c) a_n z^{n+c-1} - \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } (n+c)a_nz^{n+c-2}- \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } a_n z^{n+c-1}=0[/itex].
Now I set every series in powers of [itex]z^{n+c-2}[/itex].
[itex]\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty } z^{n+c-2} a_n [(n+c)(n+c-1)-(n+c)] + \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } z^{n+c-2} (n+c-1)a_{n-1}-\sum _{n=1}^{\infty } z^{n+c-2}a_{n-1}=0[/itex]
So [itex]\sum _{n=0}^{\infty } z^{n+c-2}a_n (n+c)(n+c-2)+ \sum {n=1} ^{\infty } z^{n+c-2} a_{n-1}(n+c-2)=0[/itex].
The secular equation is thus [itex]z^{c-2} a_0 c(c-2)=0[/itex] with roots [itex]c=0[/itex] or [itex]c=2[/itex].
Continuing the work on the infinite series, I get that [itex]\sum _{n=1}^{\infty } z^{n+c-2} [a_n (n+c)(n+c-2)+a_{n-1}(n+c-2)]=0[/itex].
Hence the reccurrence relation I get is [itex]a_n (n+c)(n+c-2)+a_{n-1}(n+c-2)=0[/itex].
First case: [itex]c=0[/itex]:
[itex]a_n=\frac{-a_{n-1}}{n}[/itex].
Choosing [itex]a_0=1[/itex], I get [itex]a_1=-1[/itex], [itex]a_2=\frac{1}{2}[/itex], [itex]a_3=-\frac{1}{2 \cdot 3}[/itex]. In general I notice the pattern [itex]a_n = \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}[/itex] so that [itex]y_1 (z)= \frac{(-1)^n z^n}{n!}=e^{-z}[/itex]. This is a good sign because you obtained the same solution.
Second case: [itex]c=2[/itex]:
[itex]a_n=- \frac{a_{n-1}}{n+2}[/itex].
Choosing [itex]a_0=1[/itex], I get [itex]a_1=- \frac{1}{3}[/itex], [itex]a_2 = \frac{1}{3 \cdot 4 }[/itex], [itex]a_3=- \frac{1}{3 \cdot 4 \cdot 5 }[/itex].
In general I notice the pattern [itex]a_n = \frac{(-1)^n \cdot 2 }{(n+2)!} \Rightarrow y_2 (z) = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty }\frac { 2 \cdot (-1)^n z^{n+2}}{(n+1)!}[/itex].
Hmm now that I think about it, I don't really see how it's possible to reach a solution of the form [itex]e^{-\frac{1}{z}}[/itex] (this is what I should reach according to your solution) because this would mean a different form than powers of [itex]z^{n+c}[/itex], in fact this would require infinitely many negative powers of z. I'm at a loss at understanding what's going on.
 
I just read some theory and I've "learned" something.
If the indicial equation leads to two roots which differ by an integer then I cannot assume that (assuming that [itex]c_1<c_2[/itex]) [itex]y_2(z)= \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } a_n z^{n+c_2}[/itex]. This explains why my solution for [itex]y_1(z)[/itex] is right but not the one for [itex]y_2(z)[/itex].
In order to find [itex]y_2(z)[/itex], I used the method which starts by assuming that [itex]y_2(z)=v(z)y_1(z)[/itex].
After a lot of algebra I reached that [itex]y_2(z)=c_1(z-1)+c_2e^{-z}[/itex].
Which implies that the complentary solution to the homogeneous DE is [itex]y_c (z)=c_1e^{-z}+c_2(z-1)[/itex].
From this fact, I had some fun and checked out the validity of Abel's theorem.
It only remains to find the particular solution to the DE [itex]y''+ \left ( \frac{z-1}{z} \right ) y' - \frac{y}{z}=z[/itex].
I used variation of parameters but still haven't found out the solution (I think I should reach [itex]y_p(z)=z^2-2z+2[/itex] which is equivalent to [itex]x^2+1[/itex]). I reach an extremely complicated function given by wolfram; I'll recheck my algebra.
I think your solution [itex]y_c = Ae^{x/(1+x)}+Be^{-x}[/itex] is equivalen to [itex]Ae^{-\frac{1}{z}}+Be^{-z}[/itex] which isn't equivalent to my solution. Is something I've said wrong?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K