Boyle's law vs the Venturi effect

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homeylova223
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boyle's law Law Venturi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between Boyle's Law and the Venturi effect, particularly how pressure and velocity behave in a constricted flow. Participants explore the implications of these principles in the context of fluid dynamics, addressing both gases and liquids.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that in a Venturi tube, as the tube narrows, the fluid's velocity increases while the pressure decreases, which seems to contradict Boyle's Law that states decreased volume leads to increased pressure.
  • Others argue that the volume of the fluid does not decrease as it moves through the Venturi; rather, the same parcel of fluid occupies a longer portion of the tube, maintaining a constant volume.
  • One participant suggests that the pressure drop in the Venturi is a result of static pressure energy being converted to kinetic energy, rather than a direct application of Boyle's Law.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the Venturi effect can be observed in both liquids and gases, with gases behaving as incompressible at subsonic speeds, but acknowledges that compressibility affects the mathematical relations at higher speeds.
  • Some contributions clarify that pressure is defined as force per area, and the area of the narrow part of the tube is indeed smaller, which impacts the pressure dynamics differently than the velocity changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between Boyle's Law and the Venturi effect, with no consensus reached on how these principles interact in fluid dynamics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of compressibility and the definitions of pressure and volume in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about fluid behavior, particularly regarding compressibility and the conditions under which Boyle's Law applies. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity on definitions of pressure and volume in relation to fluid dynamics.

homeylova223
Messages
104
Reaction score
22
So this is something I been thinking about. In venturi principle when a fluid or gas is moving across a tube when it is constricted the fluid has increased velocity. Because it in constriction the pressure goes down.

But in Boyle law if volume is decreased the pressure goes up.

So in the venturi tube when the tube gets smaller less volume should not the pressure go up
 
Science news on Phys.org
Because when a fluid moves through a venturi tube when the tube gets more narrow the pressure goes down and the fluid moves faster. But if the tube get more narrow would not there be more pressure because of boyle law. Boyle law means less volume more pressure.
 
When fluid goes through a venturi, the volume doesn't decrease. The same parcel of fluid occupies a longer portion of the tube, and (at least at speeds below a few hundred miles per hour in air) the volume remains basically constant. The velocity goes up, but the volume does not go down.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Why does the fluid occupy a longer part of the tube when it narrower. Then when it is less narrow does the fluid occupy more height??
 
Because the pressure drops, so the fluid has to occupy the same (or actually slightly more, but this is negligible at lower speeds) volume. There's nothing constraining it to compress it, and yes, when the pipe is wider, the fluid occupies more width (because the pipe is wider) but less length.
 
homeylova223 said:
Why does the fluid occupy a longer part of the tube when it narrower. Then when it is less narrow does the fluid occupy more height??
Exactly.

In a basic venturi the fluid is incompressible so by definition it must be constant volume.

The volume spreading out horizontally in the construction is the increase in velocity and the pressure drop is the result of static pressure energy being converted to kinetic energy.
 
homeylova223 said:
So this is something I been thinking about. In venturi principle when a fluid or gas is moving across a tube when it is constricted the fluid has increased velocity. Because it in constriction the pressure goes down.

But in Boyle law if volume is decreased the pressure goes up.
If the flow velocity is enough faster, you can sustain a high mass flow rate with a low density fluid (low pressure = low density) in a tube with a small cross sectional area.

You are constricting the fluid in the direction of the tube diameter. But the fluid is stretching out even more in the direction of the tube length.
 
homeylova223 said:
Because when a fluid moves through a venturi tube when the tube gets more narrow the pressure goes down and the fluid moves faster. But if the tube get more narrow would not there be more pressure because of boyle law. Boyle law means less volume more pressure.
The main difference to note is that Boyle's Law describes how pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to the volume it occupies when expanded and compressed.
That means that the gas is a compressible fluid.
It is a process not much different from a steel spring being compressed and stretched, trading length for stored force.

The Venturi effect is observable for liquids (non-compressible) and for gases (behaving as non-compressible at subsonic speeds).
For ideal conditions, the energy of the fluid going through a Venturi remains the same.
As the geometry forces it to speed up (increased kinetic energy), its pressure (potential energy) must decrease, in order to comply with Bernoulli's equation, keeping its internal energy in balance.
It is a process not much different from a ball rolling down a ramp, trading altitude for velocity.

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: homeylova223 and russ_watters
Lnewqban said:
The Venturi effect is observable for liquids (non-compressible) and for gases (behaving as non-compressible at subsonic speeds).
To elaborate a bit, to treat a gas as incompressible, the maximum velocity at the venturi throat should be less than mach 0.3, not just subsonic. However, even if the velocity exceeds mach 0.3 (but still stays below mach 1), a venturi will still act qualitatively the same way, trading pressure for velocity as the tube narrows. The mathematical relations will be a bit different though, due to compressibility.

(Of course, if you continue to increase speed until you hit mach 1 at the narrowest point, now you have a converging-diverging nozzle, which will act quite differently)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #10
I think it makes sense. Say you put have a tube and you put a fluid and it moves from left to right at the tube. At the left of the tube it is greater height less width and has a high pressure and lower velocity then it goes to the constriction and the pressures goes down but the velocity goes up.

So at the begging it is high pressure and low velocity the fluid has more height but less width, in the constriction point the fluid has more width less height and more velocity but less pressure.

But pressure is Force/Area. And the are of the narrow part of the venturi tube and the more tall part is the same Area.But I think I get it.
 
  • #11
homeylova223 said:
But pressure is Force/Area. And the are of the narrow part of the venturi tube and the more tall part is the same Area.But I think I get it.
This doesn't make sense. By area we are referring to the cross sectional area. Obviously the narrower part has a smaller area.

The pressure drop mechanism isn't the same as the velocity change mechanism. The pressure drop is best viewed through conservation of energy and Newton's laws of motion. In order to speed up, the fluid has to have a force applied. That force is from the static pressure. It's like the pressure in all directions is converted to a pressure only in the forward direction. It's pressure energy converted temporarily to kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K