Breakthrough Miniature Accelerator

  • Thread starter Thread starter sanman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a recently published technique for injecting electrons into a laser-driven plasma wave, enabling the production of high-quality electron beams with energies between 100–400 MeV. This advancement could serve as a standalone accelerator or as part of a multistage system for higher-energy applications. Participants explore potential uses in Accelerator-Driven Reactor Systems (ADRS) and generating high-energy light for nuclear applications, though concerns are raised about the practicality of using such a miniature accelerator for these purposes. The conversation highlights that existing accelerator technologies already provide sufficient energy for ADRS, questioning the need for this new method. Overall, the focus remains on the implications of this breakthrough for future particle colliders and its cost-effectiveness.
sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
This was published in Nature, so it seems credible enough:

http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphys2071.html

Laser plasma accelerators1 have produced high-quality electron beams with GeV energies from cm-scale devices2 and are being investigated as hyperspectral fs light sources producing THz to γ-ray radiation3, 4, 5, and as drivers for future high-energy colliders6, 7. These applications require a high degree of stability, beam quality and tunability. Here we report on a technique to inject electrons into the accelerating field of a laser-driven plasma wave and coupling of this injector to a lower-density, separately tunable plasma for further acceleration. The technique relies on a single laser pulse powering a plasma structure with a tailored longitudinal density profile, to produce beams that can be tuned in the range of 100– 400 MeV with per-cent-level stability, using laser pulses of less than 40 TW. The resulting device is a simple stand-alone accelerator or the front end for a multistage higher-energy accelerator.

So could this thing be used to help achieve an Accelerator-Driven Reactor System?

Can this thing generate high-energy light for nuclear applications? Perhaps to explore nucleonic transitions?

Could it be used for generating a powerful ion-beam or proton-beam, as a spallation source in an ADRS?

What are the applications here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh?

"accelerator-driven reactor" has never had issues with beam energy. There's enough energy in the current technology for it to be used. So why would such application use something this exotic? And note the BEAM SIZE that one of these could use. If you're talking about YIELD, would you use a micron size beam?

Advanced accelerator techniques such as this are mainly for achieving the next level of energy for particle collider at a lower cost that won't bankrupt a small nation.

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top