Brightness Temperature, Thermal Spectrum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misinterpretation of cosmic radiation as thermal by astronomers, specifically regarding a source in NGC 3079 emitting 100 solar luminosities at 22 GHz. The Planck function for blackbody radiation is utilized to derive the temperature, but the calculations yield a negative result, indicating a flaw in the approach. The participant calculated the flux and specific intensity (B) but expressed uncertainty about the accuracy of their calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying thermal spectrum analysis in astrophysics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's law for blackbody radiation
  • Familiarity with astrophysical luminosity and flux calculations
  • Knowledge of cosmic radiation sources and their characteristics
  • Basic grasp of Wien's displacement law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Planck function for blackbody radiation
  • Learn about the implications of negative temperature results in astrophysical contexts
  • Investigate the use of Wien's displacement law in determining effective temperatures
  • Explore advanced topics in thermal spectrum analysis and its relevance in astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying cosmic radiation and thermal spectrum analysis will benefit from this discussion.

jmm5872
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
This is a problem intended to show us that Astronomers are sometimes fooled into thinking that a cosmic source of radiation is thermal, when it is not. Here is the problem:

Consider a cosmic source emitting one hundred solar luminosities all within 1 MHz of the single frequency of 22 GHz, and assume that the source is compact; only 0.001 parsecs in radius. Such a source exists in NGC 3079. What crazy temperature would an Astronomer infer by matching the spectrum of this source at 22 GHz with a thermal spectrum?

Relevant equations:

Planck function for blackbody radiation (for frequency) B = (2hv3/c2)*1/(e(hv/kT)-1)

h = Planck constant
v = frequency
c = speed of light
k = Boltzmann constant
T = temp

flux: F = L/4(pi)r2

First I solved the Planck function for T, and I have all the values I need to plug in except B (blackbody specific intensity, which is erg s-1 cm-2 Hz-1 sr-1) So my idea to get B was to find the flux and manipulate until I have B.

First I calculated the total luminosity...100(solar luminosity) = 3.8e35 erg s-1 s-1

Then the flux, using r = 0.001pc = 3.0857e15 cm and got: 3175.896 erg s-1 cm-2

Since this is energy per unit time per unit area, and I need energy per unit time per unit area per unit frequency per unit steradian, I divided the flux above by the given frequency (2.2e10 Hz), then divided again by 2pi, which is one hemisphere of steradians. This should give me everything I need.

From calculations B = 2.297e-8 erg s-1 cm-2 Hz-1 sr-1

Then I plugged in B, and the rest of the values to calculate T, but the answer was negative.

I hope my explanation makes sense, it is hard to explain on here.
I'm not even sure if my approach was correct, if so I'm not sure if I calculated B correctly.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
972
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K