Broken Spaceship Accelerating towards circular sheet of dust

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a broken spaceship located above a large circular sheet of dust, with gravitational interactions between the two. The participants are tasked with determining the initial acceleration of the spaceship, its acceleration just before impact with the dust, and the experiences of the astronauts at that moment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the changing distance from the spaceship to points on the dust sheet and explore the implications of this on gravitational force calculations. There are attempts to set up integrals to compute the forces involved, with some questioning the correctness of these integrals and the reasoning behind them.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical setup, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and notation. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of the gravitational forces right before impact, while others suggest clarifications and adjustments to the approach being taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clear definitions and proper notation in their mathematical expressions. There is also mention of the surface mass density of the dust sheet, which is provided in the problem statement, influencing the calculations being discussed.

Dusty912
Messages
149
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A broken spaceship is located 10 km above the center of a large circular thin sheet of unknown dust. The sheet has a radius of 106km and a density of 7×1011kg/m2. The spaceship and the dust attract each other due to the gravitational force. a) Find the initial acceleration of the spaceship. b) Find the acceleration of the spaceship right before the spaceship hits the dust. c) What will the astronauts in the spaceship experience right before the spaceship hits the dust?

Homework Equations


F=(GMm)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I realized that the distance from the spaceship to any point on the sheet (except the center) would constantly be changing as the spaceship moves close and closer. This prompted me to set up an integral of the form F=∫(Gm*(2Mr/R2)*h)/(r2+h2)3/2 dr with integrating factors from h2 to( R2 + h2) using U-sub and moving the constants out I obtained the answer ((1/2)*GMm)/R2)(1-h)/(r2+h2)

then use F=ma and solving for a a=F/m I obtained a=(((1/2)GM/r2)(1-(h/sqrt(r2+h2)

this seems right, but does not make any sense for the acceleration right before the spaceship hits the cloud. I would assume this value would be zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dusty912 said:

Homework Statement


A broken spaceship is located 10 km above the center of a large circular thin sheet of unknown dust. The sheet has a radius of 106km and a density of 7×1011kg/m2. The spaceship and the dust attract each other due to the gravitational force. a) Find the initial acceleration of the spaceship. b) Find the acceleration of the spaceship right before the spaceship hits the dust. c) What will the astronauts in the spaceship experience right before the spaceship hits the dust?

Homework Equations


F=(GMm)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I realized that the distance from the spaceship to any point on the sheet (except the center) would constantly be changing as the spaceship moves close and closer.
Why would the distance to the centre of the sheet not change as the spacecraft gets closer?
This prompted me to set up an integral of the form F=∫(Gm*(2Mr/R2)*h)/(r2+h2)3/2 dr with integrating factors from h2 to( R2 + h2)
So your initial integral is:
$$F=\int_{h^2}^{R^2+h^2} Gm\frac{2Mr}{R^2}h\left(\frac{1}{(r^2+h^2)^{3/2}}\right)\; dr$$ ... but you neglected to define your variables or explain your reasoning, so I have no way to evaluate your approach.

... does not make any sense for the acceleration right before the spaceship hits the cloud. I would assume this value would be zero.
Because...? Perhaps because you would expect that, with the spacecraft dead center in a uniform cloud the force would be equal in all directions ... thus zero net force and so no acceleration? Is that how you are reasoning?
 
Oh, yea I guess that distance would be changing.

Let me elaborate. But is this integral correct?

Consider the circular sheet (total mass M and radius R) as being composed of infinitesimally thin rings. One such ring, between radius r and r+dr, has an infinitesimal mass given by

dm = M/(pi R^2) * 2 pi r dr = 2 M r/R^2 dr

The distance d from this ring to the spaceship (of mass m) at height h from the center of the ring is given by Pythagoras' theorem:

d^2 = r^2 + h ^2

So this infinitesimal ring will exert an infinitesimal force

dF = G m (2M/R^2) r dr / (r^2+h^2)

But by symmetry, all the components of force perpendicular to the axis will cancel, so the component of force along the axes survives. This brings an additional geometrical factor h/sqrt(r^2+h^2). Hence, the force from the ring along the axes is

dF// = G m (2M/R^2) r h dr / (r^2+h^2)^(3/2)

The total force on the spaceship at height h then follows by adding (integrating) all contributions from the concentric infinitesimally thin rings:
 
and yes that is my reasoning for why there would be no acceleration immediatly before it hits the cloud
 
Dusty912 said:
Consider the circular sheet (total mass M and radius R) as being composed of infinitesimally thin rings. One such ring, between radius r and r+dr, has an infinitesimal mass given by

dm = M/(pi R^2) * 2 pi r dr = 2 M r/R^2 dr
The problem statement gives you the surface mass density ##\sigma## of the cloud already so there is no need to calculate it. Thus ##dm = 2\pi \sigma r \;dr##, well done. You do not need M.

The distance d from this ring to the spaceship (of mass m) at height h from the center of the ring is given by Pythagoras' theorem:
d^2 = r^2 + h ^2
Yep.

So this infinitesimal ring will exert an infinitesimal force
dF = G m (2M/R^2) r dr / (r^2+h^2)
This statement is not correct ... however you go on:

But by symmetry, all the components of force perpendicular to the axis will cancel, so the component of force along the axes survives. This brings an additional geometrical factor h/sqrt(r^2+h^2). Hence, the force from the ring along the axes is

dF = G m (2M/R^2) r h dr / (r^2+h^2)^(3/2)
... which is looking good.

Just a note on notation - you cannot use ##m## for the mass of the ship and ##dm## for the mass of a ring because, by definition ##m=\int\;dm## so you are using the same variable for two things.
... if you want the total mass of the ring to be M, then an element of that mass would be dM.
Your first step should have been: ##dF = [Gm/(d^2)][h/d]\;dM## then you can sub for d and dM and integrate over r below...

The total force on the spaceship at height h then follows by adding (integrating) all contributions from the concentric infinitesimally thin rings:
... looks good to me. Since the integral is over r, what are the limits of r?

Aside:
* "integrating factor" is a technical term in mathematics - the a and b in ##\int_a^b## are more usually called "the limits of the integration".
* "cylindrical polar coordinates" would have helped you here.
* suggest you learn LaTeX ... it will make your equations easier to read (and write).
See: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
 
are you saying that my work looks fine? or do I need to change something?

and yes I should have used latex. my apologies
 
and yes, I know it's limits of integration. I'm leaning about integrating factors in my differential equation class and mixed up the terms
 
Doing good so far ... you need to make some changes to your notation if this is to be presented as a long answer.
Next step is to justify the limits of the integration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K