Built-in potential in pn junction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the built-in potential (\phi_i) in a pn junction, specifically its calculation and implications for charge carriers. The formula for \phi_i is given as \phi_i = \frac{kT}{q} \log \left( \frac{N_D N_A}{n_i^2} \right), where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is the absolute temperature, and q is the electron charge. Participants clarify that while the p-side is at a higher potential from the electron's perspective, conventional analysis uses a positive test charge viewpoint. The vacuum level's relationship to the built-in voltage is also questioned, suggesting it may bend across the junction due to the electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pn junction theory
  • Familiarity with semiconductor physics
  • Knowledge of Boltzmann's constant and thermal equilibrium
  • Basic concepts of energy bands in solids
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the built-in potential in pn junctions
  • Explore the role of the vacuum level in semiconductor physics
  • Learn about charge carrier dynamics in semiconductor junctions
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on semiconductor behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, semiconductor physicists, and students studying solid-state electronics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the behavior of pn junctions and built-in potentials.

EmilyRuck
Messages
134
Reaction score
6
Hello!
The (potential) energy of an electron in a solid structure is always negative; also the E_c and E_v levels (conduction band and valence band limits) are negative, in the band diagram of a pn junction.
When the junction is built and thermal equilibrium is reached, the depletion region creates an electric field and a potential barrier \phi_i.
But I have some doubts about this.
1) First of all,

\phi_i = \displaystyle \frac{kT}{q} \log \left( \displaystyle \frac{N_D N_A}{n_i^2} \right)

where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is the absolute temperature and q is the absolute value of the electron charge. The energy step due to this built-in potential is q \phi_i, but why a positive q is used to calculate this step? Given a voltage difference \Delta V = \phi_i, the corresponding potential energy difference should be \Delta U = q \Delta V = - |q| \Delta V in the case of an electron.
2) Let's suppose anyway that q \phi_i > 0.
In the conduction band of the n-region, just the charge carriers with an energy E = E_c + q \phi_i can cross the junction and diffuse to the p-region. So, I would say that the p-region, with respect to the n-region, is at a higher potential.
In order to have a reference image, let's consider this document, page 11. Why in the last plot, which shows V as function of position, the n-side is at a higher potential and the p-side at V = 0? (Consider V_A = 0, that is the case of thermal equilibrium)
3) What about the vacuum level? It is never depicted in the band diagram of a pn junction; but how is it affected by the built-in voltage?
Thank you anyway for having read.

Emily
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the point of view of electron what you say is right p-side is at higher potential. But it is a convention to consider from the point of view of a positive test charge. What do you mean by vacuum level you mean at absolute zero. At absolute zero all the bonds will be in tact and there will not be any free charge to create potential difference or depletion region.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyRuck
Let'sthink said:
From the point of view of electron what you say is right p-side is at higher potential. But it is a convention to consider from the point of view of a positive test charge.

Ok, thank you.

Let'sthink said:
What do you mean by vacuum level you mean at absolute zero. At absolute zero all the bonds will be in tact and there will not be any free charge to create potential difference or depletion region.

By "vacuum level" I mean the energy of a free electron outside the crystal, as stated http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter2/ch2_3.htm, par. 2.3.3.2. Anyway, maybe the vacuum level is bent like the energy bands across the junction due to the electric field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K