Bullet & String: The Impact on Bullet Velocity and Trajectory

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arsonade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet String
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of a bullet with a string tied to its back, exploring the implications on bullet velocity and trajectory. Participants consider various factors including the strength of the string, the mass of the bullet, and the effects of the string on the bullet's motion, with a focus on theoretical and conceptual aspects rather than practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if a string were tied to a bullet before it was fired, it could potentially slow the bullet down and affect its trajectory.
  • Others argue that the string would likely break due to the bullet's high speed, and if it were strong enough not to break, it could still alter the bullet's motion significantly.
  • A participant suggests that if the string were to get caught in something, it could either stop the bullet or pull the gun forward, depending on the circumstances.
  • There is a discussion about the mass of the string affecting the bullet's distance traveled, with some participants questioning whether the wake created by the bullet could reduce drag on the string.
  • One participant mentions that devices like harpoons and wire-guided missiles utilize similar principles, indicating that the mass of the projectile and the drag of the wire are critical factors in performance.
  • Another participant highlights that the tension force from the string could negate aerodynamic drag if the wire is stationary behind the projectile.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a string tied to a bullet would impact its velocity and trajectory, but there is no consensus on the extent of this effect or the mechanics involved. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of string mass, drag, and the bullet's motion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the strength and mass of the string, the conditions under which the bullet is fired, and the effects of air resistance and drag, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in physics related to projectile motion, forces, and the effects of mass and drag in theoretical scenarios.

Arsonade
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
ok, here's my problem, let's say you had a bullet and ignoring the physics of the gun being shot(by this i meen the gunpowder explosion), what would happen if a string were tied to the back of that bullet? would it slow it down considerably? would it effect where the bullet goes?

Just wondering

Adam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what would happen if a string were tied to the back of that bullet?
Well you'd have to tie it real fast, as that bullet is moving real fast. Probably the string would break.
would it slow it down considerably?
Nah, the string would probably speed up until it broke.
would it effect where the bullet goes?
yes.

Are you planning to become a whale hunter (harpoon and rope)?
 
Jeff Reid said:
Well you'd have to tie it real fast, as that bullet is moving real fast. Probably the string would break.

Nah, the string would probably speed up until it broke.

yes.

Are you planning to become a whale hunter (harpoon and rope)?


lololol no i can't say it was the plan, now that i tjhikn of it I am not completely sure why i wanted to know this lol, anyway, what i meant was if the string was already tied before the bullet was shot so i wouldn't have to tie it on as it was shot, it would be already on as it was fired. also, just for the sake of siscussion, let's say it was some very strong string, not necacerially string so much as...uhm, well let's just say very strong string lol. anyway my question would be, if that string got cought up in the spokes, and saying the string didnt break, being the unbreakable miracle string it is, would th bullet stop? would the gun be pulled forward incredibly fast? also, after a while, the string would have to be adding extra weight to that bullet so it probably couldn't go as far, right?

Adam

now that i look at this it seems a smidge rediculous loolol
 
The harpoon is a much better example. Harpoons are fired out of a cannon, an have a rope attached. The mass of the rope affects the speed and trajectory of the harpoon. Would be more insteresting if this wasn't used to kill whales.
 
In the navy, the first line sent across between two ships when you need to transfer cargo between them is a "shot line." I'm not entirely sure how it works, but its a spool of string attached to a regular rifle. It flies maybe 200yd, on a high trajectory.
 
What if the string had negligible mass, but would be strong enough not to break and the bullet had mass, but would not get untied from the rope. The string is also tied to something. As the bullet travels it will draw the string behind it. When the bullet has traveled the length of the string, will it decelerate instantaneously?
 
will it decelerate instantaneously
No the string will stretch. Everything reacts to a force with some amount of compression or expansion near the point of application (ignoring cases like free-fall under gravititational force). A stress versus strain graph for that material indicates by how much.
 
but the thing is, as the length of the string increses, the mass of the bullet+string increses and therefore wiould decrese how far it could go right? or might the wake of the bullet keep the string aloft without a whole lot fo friction, I am not sure if wake was trhe best word, what i meen is, the area directly behind the bullet where the air has been pushed out of the way. would that keep the string from sinking? either wayit would add mre mass to the bullet and that would still slow it down...i thnk this kind of thing might be used as like a really advanced grapling hook, like if you wanted to hook up to a plane directly above you, you could fire this and then hope you can pull yourself up before its too late lol, so technically it wount be a bullet so muchas a very small grappler, probably one that has the shape of a bullet at first. so i guess you could say it is harpooning, but the harpoon has a much smaller mass and the fring mechinisim is probably just a gun with a spoke on it. shooting into a plane may not be a very good example lol, you miht just bring the plane down instead of bring you up lol.

Adam
 
The short answers are: yes and yes. A line tied to the back of a projectile will slow it down, and will affect its trajectory.

Now, the next question is: by how much?

Well, there are some devices of various sizes that do this. A harpoon being the most obvious. But there are others, I think wire-guided missiles use it. So do ranged tasers.

You want to maximize the mass of the projectile while minimizing the drag of the wire. BTW, the drag is probably due as much to the mass of the line as it is to the friction involved in unspooling.
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
You want to maximize the mass of the projectile while minimizing the drag of the wire. BTW, the drag is probably due as much to the mass of the line as it is to the friction involved in unspooling.
Actually, for a spool carried with the projectile, friction when unspooling (manifest as tension on the wire) is all of the force seen: there is no aerodynamic drag, since the wire behind the projectile is stationary.

Mass of the wire is a double-edged sword: it increases the momentum of the projectile, which decreases the effect of the tension force, but it also increases the force needed to pull it off of the spool. It probably cancels out completely.
 
  • #11
ok, well this was interesting, onto the designs!

Adam
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
49K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
27K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
19K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K