Burnout of 6300 Lumen Light Bulb: Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CookieSalesman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightbulb
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the premature burnout of a 6300 lumen tungsten light bulb in a small desk lamp, which typically supports lower wattage bulbs. Users highlight that exceeding the lamp's maximum wattage can lead to overheating and potential fire hazards, emphasizing that the bulb's high heat output may not be suitable for the lamp's design. Concerns about handling high-wattage bulbs, such as avoiding fingerprints on the glass, are raised, as they can create hotspots. The conversation also points out that the bulb's failure could stem from a bad unit or issues with the lamp's wiring, rather than solely the bulb's wattage. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that using bulbs exceeding the lamp's rated capacity is risky and could lead to dangerous situations.
  • #51
Welcome to PF!
interestedcrl said:
InterestedCRL -- I think incandescent filament bulbs have greatly lost their lasting quality since Congress passed laws allegedly to 'save enengy', which affected that type of bulb quality. But I think more unnecessary burnouts and more sales were the real motivation of the law, and not consumer health, safety, nor 'pro-environment'.
Erm, huh? The sales of most common incandescents were banned, so their sales plummeted to essentially nothing. So no, the law certainly did not increase sales of incandescents.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #52
interestedcrl said:
InterestedCRL -- I think incandescent filament bulbs have greatly lost their lasting quality since Congress passed laws allegedly to 'save enengy', which affected that type of bulb quality. But I think more unnecessary burnouts and more sales were the real motivation of the law, and not consumer health, safety, nor 'pro-environment'.

Why would you think that? Logically, a more energy efficient incandescent bulb of a given basic style would have to run a hotter filament. This would increase efficiency, but reduce life. Also, bulbs are now largely produced in China.

Filament type vacuum tubes produced in the USA lasted 20-30 years and were nearly 100% good out of box. The same tube, produced in China, has an out-of-box infant mortality rate of about 50%. Those that do go beyond infant failure last about 2-3 years at best. It seems pretty strange to come up with a government conspiracy theory when multiple facts point to production issues.

I'm not saying short life is not an issue, but it is a fact that more efficient incandescent bulbs have shorter life (all things equal) and Chinese products are often terrible quality.
 
  • #53
Tom Rauji said:
Too many wives tales about filaments. Shut down speed or ramp-down of the filament is meaningless.
That's an interesting observation and it makes sense; the peak current will certainly be during the initial 100ms or so and that will be when most power is dissipated by the filament. I have noticed that high power filaments (300W and 500W stage lights) do seem to develop 'rough' sections along their length. That could be what you are referring to.
 
Back
Top