By using Gauss' law, can the electric field be p/(pi*ε*r^2)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Gauss' law to determine the electric field, specifically questioning whether the formula p/(π*ε*r^2) is valid. Participants reference Schaum's Electromagnetics (4th ed) by Edminister and a HyperPhysics resource for clarification. Key points include the importance of calculating flux correctly, considering both the end caps and lateral area of the closed surface, and the necessity of using the correct surface area formula for a cylinder, which is 2πrL, not πr²L. The consensus is that the first method is dimensionally incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with electric flux calculations
  • Knowledge of surface area formulas for geometric shapes
  • Basic principles of radial electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss' law in electromagnetism
  • Learn how to calculate electric flux through various surfaces
  • Review the geometry of cylinders and their surface area calculations
  • Explore the implications of dimensional analysis in physics equations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering electromagnetism and the application of Gauss' law in electric field calculations.

adamaero
Messages
109
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
By using Gauss' law, can the electric field be p/(pi*ε*r^2) instead of p/(2*pi*ε*r) where "p" is the charge distribution?
Relevant Equations
Q = p*l
Which is better to use? The equation for the area or the circumference of a circle?
1564439256948.png

Schaum's Electromagnetics (4 ed) by Edminister
vs
1564439431674.png

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elecyl.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to figure out the answer to your question on your own. Do you know how to calculate flux?
 
You could also check dimensions, which every physics student should. Of course, that is not what is asked for here but you should nevertheless always do it.
 
Note that you must add both the flux through the end caps as well as that through the lateral area to get the total flux through a closed surface. However, the field is radial and therefore the flux theough the end caps is zero.
 
vela said:
You should be able to figure out the answer to your question on your own. Do you know how to calculate flux?
The flux in the second way is easy, the first method, however, is somewhat ambiguous. It is suggesting that ##\rho=r/2##.
 
The first method seems simply wrong; it assumes the surface area of a cylinder is πr2L, rather than 2πrL. The answer is dimensionally wrong.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: vela, archaic and adamaero

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
855
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K