Understanding Why C/d = pi is a Constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hepic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Pi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the ratio of the circumference (C) to the diameter (d) of a circle is a constant, represented by π (approximately 3.14). The proof involves geometric principles, particularly similar triangles, which demonstrate that this ratio holds true in Euclidean geometry. However, it is noted that this relationship does not apply in spherical geometry, where the ratio can vary. The conversation highlights the foundational role of Euclidean assumptions in establishing the constancy of C/d. Understanding these geometric principles is essential for grasping why π remains a constant in flat geometrical contexts.
Hepic
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Lets say that "d" is diametr of a circly,and C is the perimetr(length).
Why C/d = pi (3.14) is a constant?? I know the proof of archimides with poligons,from which found the value of pi,but how we know that C/d is always equal with a constant that we named as π=3.14;

Thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I found it guys. The proof use similar triangles etc...
Thanks for your time !
 
Hepic said:
I found it guys. The proof use similar triangles etc...
Thanks for your time !

This also requires assumptions of Euclidean geometry. In spherical geometry it is not constant.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top