Calc Electron & Hole Concen in Silicon at 300K

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equilibrium electron and hole concentrations in silicon at 300K, given specific donor and acceptor densities. The initial calculations yielded electron concentration n_0 as 9.26×10^9 and hole concentration p_0 as 7.26×10^9, but these results were flagged as incorrect in an online quiz. Participants identified a potential typo in the formula used for n_0, specifically regarding parentheses in the square root. There was also a note about the variability of the intrinsic carrier concentration (n_i) values found online, with some sources reporting higher values than the one provided in the problem. The consensus is that the calculations are correct if the given n_i is used, but attention to detail in the formula is crucial.
bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For silicon at T=300K with donor density ND=2×109cm−3, acceptor density NA=0 and ni=8.2×109cm−3, calculate the equilibrium electron and hole concentration

Homework Equations


n_0=\frac{N_D-N_A}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{N_D-N_A}{2}^2+n_i^2}

p_o=\frac{n_i^2}{n_0}

The Attempt at a Solution


I get
n_0=9.26\times10^9 and p_0=7.26\times10^9
But whenever I enter the results into the online quiz it says it's wrong, am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobred said:
$$n_0= \frac{N_D-N_A}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{N_D-N_A}{2}^2+n_i^2}$$​
Check your electron concentration equation again, you may be missing a parenthesis inside the square root.
 
Last edited:
Yes there is a typo, the calculation was correct though, it should be

<br /> n_0=\frac{N_D-N_A}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{(N_D-N_A)}{2}^2+n_i^2}<br />
 
bobred said:

Homework Statement


For silicon at T=300K with donor density ND=2×109cm−3, acceptor density NA=0 and ni=8.2×109cm−3, calculate the equilibrium electron and hole concentration
This might not be relevant, but the value of ##n_i## given here for Si at 300 K is somewhat smaller than values that I have found in a search on the internet (which tend to be between 1.0 x 1010 cm-3 and 1.5 x 1010 cm-3). But I did come across one site that listed a value close to your value. Certainly, if the value you used is the value that is given in the statement of the problem, then you should use it.
 
Last edited:
I have seen similar values too, but the value was given on a sheet of constants. Can't see where the problem is.
 
bobred said:
Yes there is a typo, the calculation was correct though, it should be

<br /> n_0=\frac{N_D-N_A}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{(N_D-N_A)}{2}^2+n_i^2}<br />
Still looks like a typo is present. The denominator of 2 inside the root should be squared. But I agree with your calculated value for ##n_0##.
 
You are correct TSny, I was rushing and didn't check it properly.
 
Back
Top