Calculas of variation /euler,s equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sncum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculas Variation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculus of variations and Euler's equation, specifically focusing on finding the shortest distance between two points in three-dimensional space. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the problem and the application of variational principles to derive the equations governing the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about finding the shortest distance between two points in three dimensions and seeks guidance on starting the problem.
  • Another participant provides a detailed mathematical formulation of the length of a curve and the variational principle, leading to the Euler equations, which suggest that the solution is a straight line.
  • A participant indicates difficulty in obtaining a straight line despite following the provided method and requests more comprehensive details.
  • There are mentions of challenges in properly applying derivatives and using the variational principle, with one participant noting they have not attached their solution for review.
  • Another participant shares a complex derivation involving integrals and variations, leading to the Euler equations, and asks if their steps align with those of the original poster.
  • One participant expresses understanding of the implications of setting the partial derivatives to zero, suggesting that this leads to a straight line in three dimensions.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the calculus of variations and requests book recommendations for further study, seeking clarity on the main purpose of the method.
  • Another participant recommends textbooks on classical mechanics that cover variational calculus, explaining its purpose in finding paths that extremize integral values.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the assistance received in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are varying levels of understanding and application of the calculus of variations and Euler's equations. Some participants express confusion and seek further clarification, while others provide detailed mathematical insights.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention challenges with specific mathematical steps and the application of derivatives, indicating potential limitations in their understanding or execution of the variational calculus method.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in calculus of variations, mathematical physics, and those seeking to understand the application of variational principles in finding optimal paths in three-dimensional space.

sncum
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
i m little confusd in (finding the shortest distance b/w two points is a straight line in three dimensions)i have solved it but nothing found any accurate result
[ds][/2]=[dx][/2]+[dy][/2]+[dz][/2] is the distance in 3-dimension b/w 2 points then
how we can start and how we can take functional by this information?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The length of a curve is [itex]\int_{s_0}^{s_1}ds=\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}\sqrt{(\frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}ds[/itex]. Setting the variation of this integral to zero one obtains [itex]\delta\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}\sqrt{( \frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}ds=0\Rightarrow \int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}\frac{\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})+\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{s}})+\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{z}}{\partial{s}})}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}ds=0[/itex]. Integrating by parts (requiring the boundary terms to vanish) and using the fundamental theorem of variational calculus will yield the Euler equations (which turn out to be rather simple in this case). Solving the Euler equations will yield a straight line.
 
Thanx i have tried but i didn,t get straight line please if u will provide a comprehensive detail than ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
If you post what you have done so far I will better know how to help.
 
i couldn,t found the method to write the proper derivative in square root (in Newton method , dot put on variable) but i tell u that i have taken their dervative with respect to time and using the limits from t1 to t2 and used the variational principle of minima but further solved it but ....as usual:cry:
 
Thats why i have not attached my solution
 
[itex]\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}\frac{\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})+\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{s}})+\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{z}}{\partial{s}})}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}ds=0\Rightarrow\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}\frac{\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}ds+\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)} \frac{\frac{ \partial{y}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}ds+\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)} \frac{\frac{ \partial{z}}{\partial{s}}\delta( \frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{s}})}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}ds=0[/itex] taking [itex]U=\frac{\frac{ \partial{q}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}[/itex] and [itex]dV=\delta( \frac{\partial{q}}{\partial{s}})ds=\frac{\partial{(\delta{}q)}}{\partial{s}}ds=d(\delta{q})[/itex], where q is the appropriate coordinate in each integral, one obtains [itex]\left[\frac{\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}}\delta{x}+\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{s}}\delta{y}+\frac{\partial{z}}{ \partial{s}}\delta{z}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}-\int_{(x_0,y_0,z_0)}^{(x_1,y_1,z_1)}\frac{\partial}{\partial{s}}\left[\frac{\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]\delta{x}+ \frac{\partial}{\partial{s}}\left[ \frac{\frac{ \partial{y}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]\delta{y}+\frac{\partial}{\partial{s}}\left[ \frac{\frac{ \partial{z}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]\delta{z}\,\,ds=0[/itex]. By the fundamental principle of variational calculus the coefficients of the variations must independently vanish. This yields three coupled partial differential equations: [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial{s}}\left[\frac{\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]=0\,\,\,\,\frac{\partial}{\partial{s}}\left[ \frac{\frac{ \partial{y}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]=0\,\,\,\, \frac{\partial}{\partial{s}}\left[ \frac{\frac{ \partial{z}}{\partial{s}}}{\sqrt{(\frac{ \partial{x}}{\partial{s}})^2+( \frac{\partial y}{\partial{s}})^2+(\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial {s}})^2}}\right]=0[/itex], which are the Euler equations for this problem. Are these steps similar to yours?

Edit: P.S. If you hit the quote button under a post you can see what was typed to produce the post.
 
Last edited:
Thanx i understood that this partial derivative = zero so entire term inside the bracket is equal to some constant ad by the elimination process of constants we get a stright line in 3-dimension right or,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:smile:
 
i think i didn't get the calculas of variation or the euler's method(form).if u vl refer me some books which deals with abc...to xyz...please recommend and also please told me that wht actually we are doing while dealing with this method whts our main purpose is?
 
  • #10
I first learned variational calculus in Intermediate Mechanics (Mechanics for Physics majors). We used John Taylor's Classical Mechanics textbook, in which variational calculus is covered in chapter 6. For a more advanced treatment (at the graduate level), Goldstein's Classical Mechanics is popular. In it variational calculus is covered in chapter 2. I think most popular books on Mechanics for physicists cover variational calculus at some point. There are also books on variational calculus with more mathematical applications (and deriviations), but I am not very familiar with them (they are probably what one would find if one looked it up at a university library in the math section).

The main purpose of this method is to find paths which extremize the value of the integral. In your problem we wanted to minimize the length of a line. In geometries that are more complex than Euclidean space even this exercise could produce non-intuitive results. Anything that you want to maximize or minimize (or obtain a stationary point for) that you can describe using an integral would be something you could analyze using this technique (assuming the solution is a contiuous function). In Physics variational calculus is used to derive equations of motion (classically, applications of Newton's second law) from equations giving the energy of a system (wikipedia- Hamiltonian Mechanics). These methods apply in all areas of Physics; Newtonian, quantum, relativistic, and just about any other part of Physics I can think of. This formulation of Physics is useful because it usually makes it easy to ensure that new theories/models obey principles such as conservation of energy, conservation of momentum, etc. due to Noether's Theorem.
 
  • #11
I am very thankful to you:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K