I Calculate acceleration from power/torque graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter gen x
  • Start date Start date
gen x
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let say we want find out acceleration of two cars with same max power, comparing only power/torque graphs, both cars are 100% identical, same mass, aero drag,etc so difference is only in rpm and power/torque curve. Cars dont use CVT gearbox(allows to keep engine at max power) they both use gears, and both have optimal gear ratios to match optimal rpm window("power band") for ther power/torque curve for best acceleration.

So if I want find acceleration for lets say 10-14k rpm window, what I need to do? Find area under power curve in that limts 10-14k rpms(definite integral), does car that have more area under power curve accelerate faster, how to find optimal rpm window(gear ratios for my power/torque curve)?


F3HIABEPGRD5VCIGNKUD34UJQA.webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

There is something wrong with that torque against RPM graph.
Power is the product of torque and RPM, so the power and torque lines should not cross as shown, they should be proportional.
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.

There is something wrong with that torque against RPM graph.
Power is the product of torque and RPM, so the power and torque lines should not cross as shown, they should be proportional.
Thanks.

I choose random photo from net.
We can look at this, just assume both have same max power.
Is there any advantge for engine that revs higher?

NA engine
40l_9912_911_gt3rs_s0_vs_s1_e85_c.webp



turbo engine
991.2-GT2RS-stock-vs.-TPC-Stage2-900x572.webp


r6 dyno.webp
 
Last edited:
You have a torque to RPM graph.
For each RPM being considered, multiply the torque by the gear ratio and by the differential ratio.
Knowing the radius of the wheel, convert that torque to a linear force, F, on the road at the tire contact patch.
You know the mass of the vehicle, m, and that F = m·a ;
Acceleration, a = F / m.
 
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K