Calculate area with double integral.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the area of the region bounded by the leaves of the rose defined by the polar equation \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\). Participants are exploring the concept of the region of integration with respect to \(\theta\), particularly the limits of integration and the symmetry of the rose curve.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Mac expresses confusion about the limits of integration, questioning why they appear to be from \(0\) to \(\pi\) instead of \(0\) to \(2\pi\).
  • Some participants suggest using symmetry to simplify the integration process, proposing to multiply the integral by 6 and integrate from \(0\) to \(\frac{\pi}{6}\), which corresponds to half a petal.
  • There is a correction made regarding the equation, clarifying that it should be \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\) instead of \(r=\cos(3\theta)\), although this correction is noted to not affect the conceptual understanding.
  • Participants discuss the traversal around the rose, noting that it takes \(\frac{\pi}{6}\) radians to travel from the tip of a petal to the origin and \(\pi\) radians to complete a full traversal of the rose.
  • Mac reflects on a misunderstanding regarding the equation accounting for "vacant" areas, indicating a conceptual gap in understanding the integration limits.
  • A later reply explains that for certain values of \(\theta\), where \(\cos(3\theta)\) is negative, the corresponding \(r\) values are also negative, which affects the tracing of the curve.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the limits of integration, with some advocating for the use of symmetry while others express confusion about the inclusion of certain regions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual understanding of the integration limits.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the understanding of how negative \(r\) values affect the integration limits and the representation of the rose curve. The discussion highlights the dependence on the interpretation of the polar equation and the symmetry of the petals.

MacLaddy1
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I haven't been on here for a while. I'm glad to see that everything is picking up nicely.
Anyway, I have a question that I see the answer to, but I am not understanding the concept.

Find the area of the region bounded by all leaves of the rose \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\)

The thing I am having a hard time grasping is the region of integration wrt \(\theta\). It appears that it is going from \(0\) to \(\pi\), but it seems to me that it should be \(0\) to \(2\pi\). However, that isn't correct.

Can anyone explain to me why the entire bottom half of the rose isn't included in the integration?

Thanks much,
Mac
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to make a complete circuit.

I would use symmetry and multiply the integral by 6 and integrate from 0 to $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ (over 1/2 a petal).
 
MarkFL said:
It only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to make a complete circuit.

I would use symmetry and multiply the integral by 6 and integrate from 0 to $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ (over 1/2 a petal).

Note that I made a mistake in the original problem. It should be \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\), not \(r=\cos(3\theta)\). I have made the correction.

I still don't think I understand. If the region of integration starts at the origin, and heads out r, then proceeds to sweep around the full angle, then it should be 2pi.

There is a concept here I am failing to grasp.
 
Your revision doesn't affect anything conceptually. It will quadruple the area though.

Trace your way around the rose. You will find it only takes $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ radians to travel from the tip of a petal to the origin, or $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{3}$ radians to travel all the way around a petal. There are 3 petals, so it only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to travel all the way around the rose 1 time.
 
MarkFL said:
Your revision doesn't affect anything conceptually. It will quadruple the area though.

Trace your way around the rose. You will find it only takes $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ radians to travel from the tip of a petal to the origin, or $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{3}$ radians to travel all the way around a petal. There are 3 petals, so it only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to travel all the way around the rose 1 time.

Oh, well then. That's simple. For some reason I thought the equation would automatically account for the "vacant" areas, but I guess not.

Thanks, I appreciate the assistance.

Mac
 
MacLaddy said:
Find the area of the region bounded by all leaves of the rose \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\)

The thing I am having a hard time grasping is the region of integration wrt \(\theta\). It appears that it is going from \(0\) to \(\pi\), but it seems to me that it should be \(0\) to \(2\pi\). However, that isn't correct.

Can anyone explain to me why the entire bottom half of the rose isn't included in the integration?
The point is that for values of $\theta$ where $\cos(3\theta)$ is negative, $r$ is also negative. In that case, the corresponding point on the curve will be on the opposite side of the origin to the direction in which $\theta$ is pointing. For example, as $\theta$ goes from $\pi/6$ to $\pi/2$, the value of $r=2\cos(3\theta)$ goes from 0 to $-2$ and then back to 0, and the curve will trace out one of the petals in "the bottom half of the rose".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K