MHB Calculate area with double integral.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the area of the region bounded by the rose curve defined by \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\). The confusion arises regarding the limits of integration for \(\theta\), with the original assumption being \(0\) to \(2\pi\), which is incorrect. Instead, it is clarified that only \(0\) to \(\pi\) is needed due to the symmetry of the petals, where the area can be calculated by integrating from \(0\) to \(\frac{\pi}{6}\) and multiplying by 6. The negative values of \(r\) for certain \(\theta\) indicate that the curve traces back over itself, which explains why the entire bottom half is not included in the integration. Understanding the behavior of \(r\) in relation to \(\theta\) is crucial for correctly determining the area.
MacLaddy1
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I haven't been on here for a while. I'm glad to see that everything is picking up nicely.
Anyway, I have a question that I see the answer to, but I am not understanding the concept.

Find the area of the region bounded by all leaves of the rose \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\)

The thing I am having a hard time grasping is the region of integration wrt \(\theta\). It appears that it is going from \(0\) to \(\pi\), but it seems to me that it should be \(0\) to \(2\pi\). However, that isn't correct.

Can anyone explain to me why the entire bottom half of the rose isn't included in the integration?

Thanks much,
Mac
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to make a complete circuit.

I would use symmetry and multiply the integral by 6 and integrate from 0 to $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ (over 1/2 a petal).
 
MarkFL said:
It only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to make a complete circuit.

I would use symmetry and multiply the integral by 6 and integrate from 0 to $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ (over 1/2 a petal).

Note that I made a mistake in the original problem. It should be \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\), not \(r=\cos(3\theta)\). I have made the correction.

I still don't think I understand. If the region of integration starts at the origin, and heads out r, then proceeds to sweep around the full angle, then it should be 2pi.

There is a concept here I am failing to grasp.
 
Your revision doesn't affect anything conceptually. It will quadruple the area though.

Trace your way around the rose. You will find it only takes $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ radians to travel from the tip of a petal to the origin, or $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{3}$ radians to travel all the way around a petal. There are 3 petals, so it only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to travel all the way around the rose 1 time.
 
MarkFL said:
Your revision doesn't affect anything conceptually. It will quadruple the area though.

Trace your way around the rose. You will find it only takes $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{6}$ radians to travel from the tip of a petal to the origin, or $\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{3}$ radians to travel all the way around a petal. There are 3 petals, so it only takes $\displaystyle \pi$ radians to travel all the way around the rose 1 time.

Oh, well then. That's simple. For some reason I thought the equation would automatically account for the "vacant" areas, but I guess not.

Thanks, I appreciate the assistance.

Mac
 
MacLaddy said:
Find the area of the region bounded by all leaves of the rose \(r=2\cos(3\theta)\)

The thing I am having a hard time grasping is the region of integration wrt \(\theta\). It appears that it is going from \(0\) to \(\pi\), but it seems to me that it should be \(0\) to \(2\pi\). However, that isn't correct.

Can anyone explain to me why the entire bottom half of the rose isn't included in the integration?
The point is that for values of $\theta$ where $\cos(3\theta)$ is negative, $r$ is also negative. In that case, the corresponding point on the curve will be on the opposite side of the origin to the direction in which $\theta$ is pointing. For example, as $\theta$ goes from $\pi/6$ to $\pi/2$, the value of $r=2\cos(3\theta)$ goes from 0 to $-2$ and then back to 0, and the curve will trace out one of the petals in "the bottom half of the rose".
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K