Calculating the surface area of a sphere using dA

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the surface area of a sphere using differential area elements (dA). Participants explore the mathematical expressions involved, particularly the roles of angles and the integration limits, as well as the geometric interpretations of these elements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the use of ##rcos\theta d\phi## versus ##rd\phi## for calculating surface area, questioning the necessity of the cosine factor.
  • There is a discussion about the integration limits for ##\theta##, with some suggesting it should range from ##-\frac{\pi}{2}## to ##\frac{\pi}{2}## based on the definition of the angle from the south to north pole.
  • Participants propose that the surface area of a ring at a fixed ##\theta## should be calculated using the correct circumference, which involves the cosine factor due to the curvature of the sphere.
  • Some participants challenge the geometric interpretations of circles drawn in relation to the sphere, debating whether certain circles fit the curvature appropriately.
  • There are references to polar coordinates and transformations that relate different angle definitions, indicating a complexity in the coordinate system used.
  • One participant emphasizes that the standard approach to calculating the surface area involves parallel slices to the xy-plane, which contrasts with the tilted red circle proposed by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to defining the differential area element or the geometric interpretations of the circles involved. Multiple competing views remain regarding the necessity of the cosine factor and the appropriate integration limits.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the geometric representations and the definitions of the angles used in the calculations. The discussion highlights the complexity of integrating over a sphere and the implications of different coordinate systems.

  • #31
Perhaps this bideo from 3blue1brown will give you a different perspective on the sphere

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
annamal said:
To be a full circle
When you go from the South Pole to the North Pole, you only go through half a circle, not a full circle. That is what the integral we are talking about is doing. It is adding up the areas of infinitesimal circular "slices" of the Earth's surface, each "slice" taken at a different latitude, over the full range of latitudes from the South Pole to the North Pole. The area of each infinitesimal slice is the circumference of the circle at latitude ##\theta##, which is ##2 \pi r \cos \theta##, times the infinitesimal width of the slice, which is ##r d \theta##. So we are integrating ##2 \pi r^2 \cos \theta d \theta## from ##\theta = - \pi / 2##, the South Pole, to ##\theta = \pi / 2##, the North Pole.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #33
annamal said:
To be a full circle, doesn't it have to be 2pi?

If you wonder about polar coordinates that includes a modified verion of measuring ##\theta## from xy plane not from usual z axis, you can see many explanations in school texts and web contents. Peter also has done a good explanation in the previous post.

If you question about coordinates system that I said in post #23 the figure of which you quoted, imagine as follows.
Imagine all the curves mentioning constant longitude spanning between the North pole and the South pole in your mind.
Imagine the equator circle is made of sponge wet with red ink. Turn it gradually along the East pole - the West pole axis. You see those curves are getting painted red left after the equator circle passes. How much angle should the equator circle turn to paint all parts of those curves ?
And how about it when not the full equator circle but only a half equator circle between EW axis sponge is wet ?
Colored red points on the globe surface have been shown already appointed by the coordinates.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
anuttarasammyak said:
If you wonder about polar coordinates that includes a modified verion of measuring ##\theta## from xy plane not from usual z axis, you can see many explanations in school texts and web contents. Peter also has done a good explanation in the previous post.

If you question about coordinates system that I said in post #23 the figure of which you quoted, imagine as follows.
Imagine all the curves mentioning constant longitude spanning between the North pole and the South pole in your mind.
Imagine the equator circle is made of sponge wet with red ink. Turn it gradually along the East pole - the West pole axis. You see those curves are getting painted red left after the equator circle passes. How much angle should the equator circle turn to paint all parts of those curves ?
And how about it when not the full equator circle but only a half equator circle between EW axis sponge is wet ?
Colored red points on the globe surface have been shown already appointed by the coordinates.
I get it now. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K