Calculate Deflection for Aluminium Tube Beam - Inertia, Mass & δ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the deflection of a simply supported aluminium tube beam under a concentrated load. The correct formula for deflection is confirmed as δ = F L³ / 48 E I, where I is the moment of inertia. The moment of inertia for a hollow tube is provided as I = π(D⁴ - d⁴) / 64, emphasizing that it depends on the cross-sectional shape rather than mass. The maximum deflection is calculated to be approximately 1.48 mm for the given parameters. Understanding the moment of inertia is essential for accurately predicting beam behavior under load.
EddieC147
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Calculating Beam Deflection with Moment of Inertia and Mass
Hi There,

I am wanting to calculate the amount of deflection (δ) from a simply supported Beam. My Beam is an Aluminium Tube ø30mm with a 3mm Wall Thickness.
Force (F) - 500N
Length (L) - 610mm
Youngs Modulus (E) - 68 Gpa
Moment of Inertia (I) - ?
δ = F L³48 E I

Q1:
Is this the correct formula that I found online?
Q2: Put Simply why is the Moment of Inertia needed for this? ( I know this isn't relevant to solving the problem but I want to learn and understand)
Q3: What units should the Moment of inertia be measured into be entered into this formula?

The formula for the moment of inertia (I) of a tube I have found online is below.
Mass - M
Bore Radius - R1
Tube Radius - R2
I = 1/2 M (R1²+ R2²)

Q4: Is this the correct formula for finding the moment of inertia of a Hollow Tube?
Q5: What units should the Radius be measured into make the end unit match with Q3?
Q6: What units should the mass be measured into make the end unit match with Q3?

Finding the Mass needs the density of aluminium multiplied by the volume.

Q7: Do I need to multiply this by the volume of the full aluminium tube?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Ed
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome, Ed!
A tube does not make a very strong beam.
In order to resist bending, the cross-section of any beam should have as much material as possible, as far as possible from its neutral axis, on the same plane the bending forces and moments are being applied.

That is the reason for the shapes of the cross-sections of steel I-beams, H-beams and C-beams, as well as structural elements with square and rectangular closed sections.
Such shapes have a greater moment of inertia (the term is confusing) than circular or oval cross-sections of similar dimensions and wall thickness.

Please, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-beam#Design_for_bending

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_modulus

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_moment_of_area

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_moment_of_area
:)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your input.

The Tube is not going to be used as a beam, just the beam bending calculation is the best way to represent the force that may act upon my Tube.
 
In this case, assuming that only the concentrated force in the middle is acting on the beam (ignoring self-weight), the maximum deflection will be: $$y_{max}=\frac{FL^{3}}{48EI}$$ where: $$I=\frac{\pi(D^{4}-d^{4})}{64}=\frac{\pi \cdot 30^{4} - 24^{4}}{64}=23474,765706 \ mm^{4}$$ Thus: $$y_{max}=\frac{500 \cdot 610^{3}}{48 \cdot 68000 \cdot 23474,765706}=1,48 \ mm$$

Here ##I## stands for area moment of inertia (also called second moment of area). It doesn't depend on the mass of the beam, only on its cross-sectional shape.
This video can help you understand the topic:



There's also one about the deflection but it discusses some advanced methods so try to get familiar with the concep of ##I## first.
 
Thanks for the reply, that is absolutely fantastic just what I wanted.

Thank you for your help
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and FEAnalyst
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top