Calculate Heat Required for 28.5g Lead Increase from 15 to 37°C

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the heat required to raise the temperature of 28.5 grams of lead from 15 to 37°C, utilizing the specific heat capacity of lead. Participants explore the appropriate formula for this calculation and the implications of sign conventions in thermodynamic processes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula q = m*C*deltaT and calculates the heat required as +81.5 J, questioning the correctness of the sign.
  • Another participant confirms the calculation is correct and explains that the sign is not a concern when discussing heat required or evolved.
  • A third participant introduces the concept of sign conventions, noting that heat evolved is typically expressed with a negative sign in thermodynamic contexts.
  • A later reply critiques the wording of questions regarding heat evolved, suggesting it may lead to confusion about whether heat is absorbed or released.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the calculation method but exhibit disagreement regarding the appropriate sign conventions for expressing heat evolved or required.

Contextual Notes

There is an unresolved discussion about the implications of sign conventions in thermodynamic calculations, particularly regarding how to express heat evolved in different contexts.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
The heat capacity of lead is 0.130 J/g C. How many joules of heat are required to raise the temperature of 28.5 grams of lead from 15 to 37?

For this problem the formula that must be used is q = m*C*deltaT, where mass is expressed in g?

q = m*C*deltaT

q = (0.130 J/g*C)*(28.5 g Pb)*(37 - 15 C) = + 81.5 J

Is my sign correct?

The formula q = m*C*deltaT, where m is expressed in grams per g/mol (Pb's molar mass), is not being asked in this question, right?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct.

When asked how much heat is required or evolved, you don't have to worry about the sign. The terms "required" and "evolved" already describe the thermicity of the process. If you are asked for the change in enthalpy, however, you must be careful with the sign.
 
Sign Conventions

For example, since "heat evolved" in these problems is used, the answer for both will be expressed with a + sign in kJ, too?


The value of the heat of reaction for the following reaction is -6535 kJ. What will be the amt. of heat in kJ evolved during the combustion of 12.0 g of C6H6?

The amt. of heat evolved for a reaction with H2 and Cl2 is -186 kJ. How many kJ of heat would evolve from reaction of 25.0 g Cl2?


Thanks.
 
Last edited:
The most commonly used convention assigns a negative sign to heat evolved (dH < 0 => exothermic). The idea is that you are trying to monitor the heat content of the system. If the system loses heat, its heat content drops, and H(fin) - H(in) < 0

However, if someone asks you "how much heat is evolved", it is unnecessary to answer with a negative number. This might make someone think that the heat is in fact absorbed (double negative). So, I dislike the wording of the second question - it is at best redundant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K