Calculate intial angle of a refracted wave

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the initial angle of a refracted wave using Snell's Law, specifically when given the velocity contrast of two layers, their thickness, and the separation between the source and receiver. The relationship between velocities and the index of refraction is established as v2/v1 = n1/n2. The user attempts to derive the equations needed to solve for the angles involved, particularly \(\theta_1\) and \(\theta_2\), but encounters complex algebraic challenges. Ultimately, the user resorts to an iterative solution in MATLAB while seeking a more elegant mathematical approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law in wave refraction
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities and functions
  • Basic knowledge of wave velocity and index of refraction
  • Experience with MATLAB for numerical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Snell's Law and its applications in wave physics
  • Learn advanced trigonometric identities and their applications in solving equations
  • Explore iterative numerical methods in MATLAB for solving complex equations
  • Research the relationship between wave velocity and index of refraction in different media
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, geophysicists, and engineers involved in wave propagation analysis, particularly those working with refracted waves in layered media.

BOYLANATOR
Messages
193
Reaction score
18
Please see attached image for problem and brief description of attempted solution.

upload_2015-6-4_18-26-28.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be more clear on what exactly is known?
 
BOYLANATOR said:
Please see attached image for problem and brief description of attempted solution.

[ ATTACH=full]84469[/ATTACH]
Yes this is solvable.
 
I'm looking for a general solution when you know the velocity contrast of the layers (to give the ratio for snells law) and you know the thickness of the two layers as well as the separation of the source and receiver.
 
BOYLANATOR said:
I'm looking for a general solution when you know the velocity contrast of the layers (to give the ratio for snells law) and you know the thickness of the two layers as well as the separation of the source and receiver.
Do you know how the velocities are related to index of refraction?
 
Yes v2/v1 =n1/n2. But whether I use the ratio of refractive indices or the ratio of velocities doesn't really matter. Either way they are just two known variables that carry through.

Without writing out my attempt at a derivation in full, what I did was re-write Θ2 in terms of Θ1. Then you get a nasty term of the form tan(arcsin(x)) which can be replaced by x/(sqrt(1-x^2)). I get rid of the other tan(theta) in terms of opp/adj in an attempt to first work them out (getting theta back will be easy at the end) but then the equations are hard to solve.

Sorry I don't have my workings here. I can write out some maths tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Lets say that D/2 is the sum of the horizontal distances traveled in the two layers (only considering the downgoing wave):

D/2 = (d_1+d_2=) z_1tan\theta_1+z_2tan\theta_2

From Snell's Law:

\theta_2=sin^{-1}(\frac{v_2}{v_1}sin\theta_1)

D/2 = z_1tan\theta_1+z_2tan(sin^{-1}(\frac{v_2}{v_1}sin\theta_1))

There is a substitution of the form:

tan(sin^{-1}(x))=\frac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}

Therefore,

D/2 = z_1tan\theta_1+z_2\frac{\frac{v_2}{v_1}sin\theta_1}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{v_2}{v_1}sin\theta_1)^2}}

From here, I wasn't sure what direction to go in. I tried swapping the angles for known distances using basic trig but the algebra became very long. The goal is really just to rearrange for either \theta_1 or if it's easier to swap out the angles then I would want to solve for either d_1 where d_1 is the horizontal distance traveled in the first layer.
 
Last edited:
I needed the solution for this to run a computer model. I have since just solved the problem iteratively in MATLAB but I am interested to know if the maths leads to a reasonably neat solution. Any ideas?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
969
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K