Calculate J Notation Impedance of Network w/ Capacitor & Inductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the J notation impedance of a network consisting of a capacitor and inductor in parallel, which is then in series with a resistor and another capacitor. The user seeks clarification on the sign convention for the J notation of capacitors, specifically why the impedance of the capacitor can be represented as both positive and negative in different contexts. The impedance equation discussed includes jwL for the inductor and -j(1/wC) for the capacitor, highlighting the importance of understanding the placement of J in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex impedance in AC circuits
  • Familiarity with J notation and its application in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of series and parallel circuit configurations
  • Basic principles of capacitors and inductors in electrical networks
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of complex impedance in AC circuit analysis
  • Learn about the product-over-sum method for calculating equivalent impedance
  • Explore the role of phase angles in J notation for capacitors and inductors
  • Review examples of impedance calculations involving series and parallel components
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing AC circuits and impedance calculations.

lubo
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have a capacitor in parallel with an inductor. These are both in series with a resistor and capacitor.

Calculate the J notation Impedance of the network. I only want the initial basic solution.

The problem I have is that sometimes the J notation of C is -ve and sometimes +ve ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Product/sum of the parallel cct:

jwL x 1/jwC/jwL*1/jwC This is the Inductor and capacitor impedance equation.

The above will be added to:

R -j(1/wC)

My question is therefore, why in the above example at product over sum would it be ok to say jwL x 1/jwC/jwL*1/jwC i.e. * a +ve 1/jwC

When below it I can add it to R and -j(1/wC)

I hope this makes sence, thanks for any help in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi lubo! :smile:
lubo said:
My question is therefore, why in the above example at product over sum would it be ok to say jwL x 1/jwC/jwL*1/jwC i.e. * a +ve 1/jwC

When below it I can add it to R and -j(1/wC)

ah, but the first j is on the bottom, while the second is on the top …

and -j = 1/j :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K