Calculate KINETIC ENERGY of proton traveling close to speed of light

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The kinetic energy of a proton traveling at a speed of 2.990 x 108 m/s, which is close to the speed of light (c = 3.000 x 108 m/s), must be calculated using relativistic equations. The correct formula is K = E - mc2, where E = mc2 / √(1 - (v/c)2). Using the rest mass of the proton (1.673 x 10-27 kg), the kinetic energy is determined to be approximately 2.914 x 10-19 joules. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using relativistic mass and energy equations rather than classical mechanics for high-velocity particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the equation E = mc2
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy formulas in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the relativistic energy-momentum relation
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their applications
  • Explore the implications of relativistic mass vs. rest mass
  • Investigate other relativistic effects, such as time dilation and length contraction
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of relativistic mechanics and kinetic energy calculations for high-speed particles.

LBRRIT2390
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A proton is traveling with a speed of v = 2.990x108 m/s. Calculate the (relativistically correct) value of the kinetic energy for this proton. Assume that the speed of light is c = 3.000 x 108 m/s and that the mass of the proton is 1.673 x 10-27 kg.

Note: Do your calculations to 4 significant figures. Then round off to give an answer good to 3 significant figures. Be sure to include the correct abbreviation for the SI unit.


Homework Equations



K = 1/2 mv2

Limit is K = 1/2mC2

The Attempt at a Solution



K=1/2(1.673x10-27)(2.990x108)
K=2.50x10-19J

Is this correct? I feel like I'm missing something here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
O should I be using the equation:

K =( g - 1 )MC2
or
K= (1/2)gMV2
?

What is the correct formula for calculating kinetic energy when a particle's speed approaches the speed of light??
 
you should use the relativistic equations to calculate the kinetic energy .. I suggest you to use :

Ek = gama*m*c^2 - mc^2 , where gama= 1/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 ) ..
 
when a particle moves with very high velocity ( close to the speed of light )
then the moving mass of the particle is given as :

M = m/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))

here,
m is ths rest mass of the particle = 1.673X10^(-27)kg
v is the velocity of the particle = 2.990X10^(8)m/s
c is the speed of light = 3.00X10^(8)m/s

using above formula the mass of the proton moving with the speed close to that of light can be calculated :

M = 6.480X10^(-26)kg

then we can obtain the kinectic energy of the proton as:

KE = (1/2)M(v^2)

KE = 2.914X10^(-19) joule

please correct if m wrong!
 
Last edited:
imnitsy said:
when a particle moves with very high velocity ( close to the speed of light )
then the moving mass of the particle is given as :

M = m/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))

here,
m is ths rest mass of the particle = 1.673X10^(-27)kg
v is the velocity of the particle = 2.990X10^(8)m/s
c is the speed of light = 3.00X10^(8)m/s

using above formula the mass of the proton moving with the speed close to that of light can be calculated :

M = 6.480X10^(-26)kg

then we can obtain the kinectic energy of the proton as:

KE = (1/2)M(v^2)

KE = 2.914X10^(-9) joule

please correct if m wrong!

I don't recall doing this when I used to take that course .. I just substitute in the formula I wrote
 
Last edited:
imnitsy said:
when a particle moves with very high velocity ( close to the speed of light )
then the moving mass of the particle is given as :

M = m/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))

here,
m is ths rest mass of the particle = 1.673X10^(-27)kg
v is the velocity of the particle = 2.990X10^(8)m/s
c is the speed of light = 3.00X10^(8)m/s

using above formula the mass of the proton moving with the speed close to that of light can be calculated :

M = 6.480X10^(-26)kg

then we can obtain the kinectic energy of the proton as:

KE = (1/2)M(v^2)

KE = 2.914X10^(-19) joule

please correct if m wrong!
That's wrong. You should abandon the notion of relativistic mass because it leads to errors like this.

In special relativity, the energy of an object of rest mass m is given by

E=\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

When v=0, you get E=mc2. This is the rest energy of the object. The object's kinetic energy is the energy in excess of the rest energy, so it's given by

K=E-mc^2

If you express the total energy E as a series in (v/c)2, you get

E=mc^2\left[1+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2+...\right]\cong mc^2+\frac{1}{2}mv^2+...

When the speed of the object is much smaller than the speed of light, you can neglect the higher-order terms and recover the Newtonian expression for kinetic energy

K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2

To get this result, we assumed v<<c, so this formula is only good when the speeds are not a significant fraction of the speed of light. In particular, you can not use it in this problem.
 
vela said:
That's wrong. You should abandon the notion of relativistic mass because it leads to errors like this.

In special relativity, the energy of an object of rest mass m is given by

E=\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

When v=0, you get E=mc2. This is the rest energy of the object. The object's kinetic energy is the energy in excess of the rest energy, so it's given by

K=E-mc^2

If you express the total energy E as a series in (v/c)2, you get

E=mc^2\left[1+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2+...\right]\cong mc^2+\frac{1}{2}mv^2+...

When the speed of the object is much smaller than the speed of light, you can neglect the higher-order terms and recover the Newtonian expression for kinetic energy

K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2

To get this result, we assumed v<<c, so this formula is only good when the speeds are not a significant fraction of the speed of light. In particular, you can not use it in this problem.

then what should be the kinetic energy for such problem!
 
I clearly said what it was in my previous post.
 
vela said:
I clearly said what it was in my previous post.

ohh you ..thanx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
24K
Replies
2
Views
3K