Calculate Momentum Change for a 1.0 kg Firecracker at 25 m/s Launch Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lacnez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the change in momentum for a two-part firecracker with a total mass of 1.0 kg, launched at a speed of 25 m/s. The firecracker separates into two equal parts at an angle of 7.5° after launch, maintaining the same speed. Participants are exploring the implications of momentum conservation and vector components in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial momentum of the firecracker and the components of velocity after separation. Questions arise regarding the direction of momentum change and the implications of conservation laws. Some participants express confusion about the calculations and the relationships between the components of momentum.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify their understanding of momentum components and the effects of the angle of separation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations, but there is still uncertainty about the correct approach to determining the change in momentum.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that air friction is negligible. There is also a focus on ensuring that the calculations reflect the correct mass of the firecracker parts and their respective velocities before and after separation.

  • #31
Don't add.

There is a different problem:
mfb said:
The sine is not the right trigonometric function...
The right function will give a similar, but not the same result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
alright i did 12.5tan7.5 = 1.6457 kg m/s
 
  • #33
Lacnez said:
alright i did 12.5tan7.5 = 1.6457 kg m/s
Yes (Good catch mfb.) But you need all three items in the answer: the direction, the numerical magnitude and the units. If you omit any of those it could be marked wrong.
 
  • #34
alright thanks a lot guy I apologize for the inconvenience I'm doing this course all online and no one to help or teach it to me so it's not the greatest thing.

Thanks again
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K